Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Anyone who think this is a good call ought to read the RAND study:

The data on adverse events were drawn from clinical trials and case reports published in the literature, submitted to the FDA, and reported to Metabolife, a manufacturer of ephedra-containing supplement products. The strongest evidence for causality should come from clinical trials; however, in most circumstances, such trials do not enroll sufficient numbers of patients to adequately assess the possibility of rare outcomes. Such was the case with our review of ephedrine and ephedra-containing dietary supplements. Even in aggregate, the clinical trials enrolled only enough patients to detect a serious adverse event rate of at least 1.0 per 1,000. For rare outcomes, we reviewed case reports, but a causal relationship between ephedra or ephedrine use and these events cannot be assumed or proven.

1 posted on 04/12/2004 11:32:20 AM PDT by hchutch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Poohbah; section9; BOBTHENAILER; Future Snake Eater; Dog; Dog Gone; My2Cents; Howlin; PhiKapMom; ...
This just stinks...

Is there any hope for a reversal on appeal? Or am I going to have to resign myself to gaining back the 25 pounds I lost since I started using Stacker 2 in August of `02?
2 posted on 04/12/2004 11:35:45 AM PDT by hchutch (Tommy Thompson's ephedra ban STINKS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson