[DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet]

It is not her sweater that flows past her rear, it is a white stripe that is part of the design of her dress, which is designed to draw attention to her rear.

Oh good grief. It is not "designed to draw attention to her rear". If she wanted to draw attention to her rear, I can guarantee you there are lots of things to wear that would do a far better job.

These young women visited the troops and all people want to talk about is what they wore. Ridiculous, but entirely predictable.

[Demetrius Slaughter]

Apparently you do not have the ability to discriminate between railing on someone for being indecent and someone making the legitimate observation that the outfits they wore to church on Easter Sunday were trashy.

If you think that those outfits were in good taste, you are welcome to your opinion, flawed as it is.

It is trashy to wear a beat up old jeans jacket over a nice white Easter dress, but it is not indecent. It is trashy to wear a bright green dress with spaghetti straps to church on Easter Sunday, but it is not indecent.

It was not that their clothing was obscene, it was that it was unseemly.

I hope this helps to clear things up for you.

[Demetrius Slaughter]

"Oh good grief. It is not "designed to draw attention to her rear". If she wanted to draw attention to her rear, I can guarantee you there are lots of things to wear that would do a far better job."

There is more than one way to skin a cat. Perhaps she did not want to draw as much attention to her rear as those other ways to which you are referring to and to that I can only say thank heavens for small favors.

I am glad the girls went to church and I am glad that they visited the troops. That was very good and I am proud of them for doing so. I still wish they had worn more tasteful outfits.