Myrloie has been the most thorough, convincing voice on this subject for ten years. What she's been saying needs to be heard.
Four days after the bombing, the New York Times received a letter of demands from the alleged bombers. The demands mostly dealt with America's relationship with Israel, but it also claimed that "they," the terrorists, had 150 suicide warriors trained to continue attacks on military and civilian sites if the demands weren't met. The FBI's response was that they didn't believe there were 150 warriors or that any threat existed.
The arrests in the '93 attack came swiftly, and as Mylroie stated, that was enough for the FBI. They'd gotten their men afterall, and so the case was completed. The same thing happened with Oklahoma City. When McVeigh and Nichols were picked up shortly afterwards, the FBI again was satisfied that they had everything in place. We now know there has been and still is suspicion of a Middle East connection. I just don't get the FBI's mindset or how they operate. I worked in the security field for 23 years and I was taught to conduct thorough investigations, leaving no stone unturned. We were told: "The only stupid question is the one you don't ask."
The bottom line is that Clinton and his minions dropped the ball after the '93 attack. Had he authorized a "Tiger Team," it's quite possible that 9/11 may have been averted. All of the things President Bush enacted after 9/11 should have been put in place in '93 by Clinton. That's why I don't understand the 9/11 Commission's failure to include the '93 WTC bombing plot in with their hearings. They are making the same error as the intelligence community by limiting the scope of their investigation.