[philetus]

"Your original message presented JBS ideas and objectives in a totally neutral context---i.e. the JBS just works to better America and they have many "admirable" goals."

As I said, I just quoted their start page.

"Now, tell me, how do YOU reconcile that neutral description with the comments made by Robert Welch to his National Council in 1960?"

You're the expert on JBS.
Did his comments represent a concensus of all the members of the JBS, at that time?
Do they still subscribe to the comments made be Welch, in the 60's?
If so, then IF the JBS was in charge, they would execute everyone that disagreed with them.


With respect to the UN -- Whether or not they have taken over in 60+ yrs isn't the isn't the question.
It's whether after 60+ yrs, the citizens and government of the U.S. has become willing to go along.

[Ernie.cal]

Ok Philetus, you are making real progress!!

You have started to ask questions that require RESEARCH in order to accurately answer the two questions you present in your message.

If JBS members in the 1960's (or today) do NOT believe the essential JBS premises (as revealed in the JBS Blue Book and other JBS publications) why would they have joined the JBS?

There is nothing in Welch's private comments at the first National Council meeting that cannot be found subsequently in publicly available JBS publications---although, sometimes, the conclusions are a bit more vague (i.e. specific names are not always mentioned for fear of libel suits, etc).

So what do you think?