Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: elbucko
Thanks. I refined it and expanded it over here. Provoked a nice discussion, too. Head over and check it out.

You know, I'm not against all animal harvest; I like steak and lobster as much as the next guy. And I am quite aware that we as a species are certainly not saints when it comes to our treatment of even those animals we breed for food. But we HAVE to draw a line somewhere. If we can't in such an obvious and self-evident case of brutal cruelty as this, then what does that make us?

Don't believe that crap about "prtecting the fish stocks", either. The seals do not eat anywhere nearly as many as are caught every year. The reason that the fishermen are having lower catches is that THEY overfish their grounds. Now, to make up the difference caused by their OWN overfishing, they're wastefully and brutally killing yet ANOTHER species. Sickening.

69 posted on 04/15/2004 9:07:34 AM PDT by Long Cut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]


To: Long Cut
The seals do not eat anywhere nearly as many as are caught every year. The reason that the fishermen are having lower catches is that THEY over fish their grounds.

I think so too. Whatever number that is cited as being the "tonnage" of fish that each seal will eat is likely to be a gross exaggeration. The "Seal Clubbing" is simply welfare. Welfare that the government of Canada gets a cut of, rather than having to pay out to the poor starving fish goons that crap in their own nest.

79 posted on 04/15/2004 10:48:02 AM PDT by elbucko (I'm not a real SOB, but I play one on FreeRepublic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson