To: oceanview
SCHNEIDER: I think it could be seriously damaging. What this says is, the White House knew what bin Laden was capable of planning, where he intended to do it, which was New York or Washington, D.C., how he was going to do it. There was only one thing missing, which was exactly when he was going to do it, which turns out to be September 11.
CNN senior political (Spin Mister)Bill Schneider.
SOURCE: http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/04/10/otsc.schneider
31 posted on
04/10/2004 6:47:59 PM PDT by
KQQL
(@)
To: KQQL
It is exactly as Dr. Rice stated it. There is a clear threat from bin Laden, but there is nothing in the report that specifically says when, where, how, or who would attack us.
Schneider is totally wrong. It mentioned explosives, but not aircraft used as missiles to bring down buildings. It mentions a hijack in order to release the blind sheik, which suggests some kind of hostage trade. It also mentions LA and refers indirectly to Seattle. It also indicates a strong overseas risk to embassies.
35 posted on
04/10/2004 6:56:32 PM PDT by
Kirkwood
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson