What are you talking about? If Arp, Tifft et al are so shunned in the community, why the heck are they getting published in Astrophysical Journal, and why are they getting money from the IAU to have conferences in far away places? He must be getting grant money from someone if he can afford to publish! Page charges are not cheap!
Telescope time on 4 meter class telescopes has been tight for EVERYONE. I could talk to the faculty and grads where I work who do optical observing, and I bet if I asked them if they felt their pet project got the telescope time it deserved they would say NO! For Arp supporters to go and bitch because they aren't getting any time at all is specious to me because of the above reason and because the models don't model the existing evidence AT ALL! Why would your throw telescope time and grant money at a project that has already shown to not be valid!? So it can be shown to not be valid in a different way? Telescope Allocation Committees don't work that way, they review proposals via academic merit, not on the what the observer has done in the past. Science is definitely a "What have you done for me lately?" discipline.
So far all I have heard from you are insults and accusations, which is pretty typical for an Arp supporter who has no clue how science is done. Keep it up!