To: Hildy
Wow...I've only had one beer but I'm completely lost here. WHO IS THE MOTHER? That's one heck of a monage-a-some-number these people have going....
To: craig_eddy
If I read it correctly, the mother is Neil Bush's current wife. The allegation in question would be that Neil's ex-wife saying that the child of his current wife's previous marriage was actually Neil's and not the new wife's ex-husband's.
Clearer?
10 posted on
04/09/2004 4:48:33 PM PDT by
thoughtomator
(Voting Bush for lack of reasonable alternatives)
To: craig_eddy
"Wow...I've only had one beer but I'm completely lost here. WHO IS THE MOTHER? That's one heck of a monage-a-some-number these people have going...."
I've had no liquor and I'm lost. But after reading the article..and careful thought..I found my excuse to have a drink. Cheers!
42 posted on
04/09/2004 8:33:42 PM PDT by
sully777
(Our descendants will be enslaved by political expediency and expenditure)
To: craig_eddy
Here's my understanding: Case involves two formerly married couples:
1. Neil & Sharon
2. Maria & Robert, who have the child.
Neil and Maria have affair. Both couples get divorced. Neil and Maria get married. Sharon has claimed Neil fathered this child during the affair. Robert is understandably angry... I guess infidelity and divorce is bad enough, but then to question legitimacy of his child is beyond the pale... one thing to show his wife cheated on him, but another thing to try to deprive him of his child. I don't blame him for striking back and hard. Looks like Sharon was willing to sling mud on the child's legitimacy just to make her ex-husband look bad. A true cheap shot.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson