To: Nita Nupress
Under copyright law, people can excerpt for fair use. While news agencies may pull their sites, we can link through Google's caches and also can post the relevant passages under the "fair use" doctrine.
It's a pain, but I don't think it's a fundamental handicap to FR's value and effectiveness.
89 posted on
04/08/2004 10:07:00 PM PDT by
Piranha
To: Piranha; Jim Robinson
great idea, would be great if the person who posted the article could go back and get google's cache (which takes about 2 days to hit the web after it posts on the internet)
97 posted on
04/08/2004 10:09:34 PM PDT by
jern
To: Piranha
While news agencies may pull their sites, we can link through Google's caches and also can post the relevant passages under the "fair use" doctrine. But examine what you said there... Google caches all of the media's articles (except those who opt out) without paying to do so. Why is Google granted a priviledge that is not afforded Free Republic? Have these outlets all sent their cease and decist letters to Google.com?
If not, then they are not effectively protecting their copyrights.
Google even caches Free Republic.
291 posted on
04/09/2004 3:03:14 AM PDT by
weegee
(Maybe Urban Outfitters should sell t-shirts that say "Voting Democrat is for Old Dead People.")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson