Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: VOA
Clinton was "forthcoming". Does that really mean anything when he pleaded guilty to lying under oath, was fined $800,000 and lost his law license?
49 posted on 04/08/2004 5:52:05 PM PDT by Terry Mross
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: Terry Mross
Clinton was "forthcoming". Does that really mean anything when he pleaded guilty to
lying under oath, was fined $800,000 and lost his law license?


Maybe I'm the last person to hear this...but I was floored when I heard this
on The Laura Ingraham Show this morning.

Bill Clinton, when testifying before the 9-11 Commission, is doing it
in private AND NOT, I REPEAT NOT, under oath.

Guess he learned enough about that perjury thang that he refuses to let his hand
make contact with a Bible (or to affirm) in a courtroom/commission proceeding.
57 posted on 04/09/2004 7:44:30 AM PDT by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson