Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

After Rice testimony, questions remain
AP ^ | 4.8.04 | Calvin Woodard

Posted on 04/08/2004 4:02:35 PM PDT by ambrose

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

1 posted on 04/08/2004 4:02:35 PM PDT by ambrose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

No, you morons.. you had your chance to ask your stupid questions... now it is time to turn out focus back to fighting the War on Terror.
2 posted on 04/08/2004 4:03:32 PM PDT by ambrose ("I actually did vote for the $87 billion before I voted against it" - John F. al-Query)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
And the "questions" will continue. . .at least until Election Day.

Michael M. Bates: My Side of the Swamp

3 posted on 04/08/2004 4:04:48 PM PDT by Mike Bates (Artist Formerly Known as mikeb704.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
After Rice Testimony, Questions Remain

...this is EXACTLY what Freepers were predicting on the live Condi thread today. Spin silk into a sow's ear. Ignore the brilliant truth.

4 posted on 04/08/2004 4:06:01 PM PDT by Sender (Support Free Republic...become a monthly donor!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Donate Here By Secure Server

5 posted on 04/08/2004 4:06:38 PM PDT by Support Free Republic (I'd rather be sleeping. Let's get this over with so I can go back to sleep!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
The AP has degenerated into a mere DNC mouthpiece, almost as jaundiced as Reuters.
6 posted on 04/08/2004 4:07:10 PM PDT by facedown (Armed in the Heartland)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
"After Rice testimony, questions remain"

When you don't like the answers just claim that "questions remain".
7 posted on 04/08/2004 4:08:34 PM PDT by lews
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
I have a question concerning the panel of ten. I had heard that the first time that Rice appeared before them, there were only five present.

Does anyone have a link or the information as to who was present the first time?

Thank You!
8 posted on 04/08/2004 4:13:16 PM PDT by Wake Up America (who was in the first panel, the first time Rice testified?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
The only question that remains is: By how many electoral votes will Lurch lose this fall?
9 posted on 04/08/2004 4:13:30 PM PDT by Young Rhino (http://www.artofdivorce.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
After Rice testimony, questions remain

About the only question I see that remains is: Why did the Dems believe that their demanding Condi Rice to testify in public wasn't going to blow up in their faces?

10 posted on 04/08/2004 4:14:04 PM PDT by dirtboy (John Kerry - Hillary without the fat ankles and the FBI files...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
This Calvin Woodward is an idiot.

He should playback the session or read the transcript.

Hamilton asks: "There are a lot of very, very fine _ 2 billion Muslims. Most of them, we know, are very fine people. Some don't like us; they hate us. They don't like what modernization does to their culture. They don't like the fact that economic prosperity has passed them by. They don't like some of the policies of the United States government. They don't like the way their own governments treat them..."

Rice replies: "... we're not going to see success on our watch. We will see some small victories on our watch. One of the most difficult problems in the Middle East is that the United States has been associated for a long time, decades, with a policy that looks the other way on the freedom deficit in the Middle East, that looks the other way at the absence of individual liberties in the Middle East. And I think that that has tended to alienate us from the populations of the Middle East..."

Don't blame us. Blame the terrorists (yes, those "very fine people"). We can't easily change them - it'll take many years. But we can focus on the War on Terror and obliterate the terrorists who want to obliterate us!

11 posted on 04/08/2004 4:17:35 PM PDT by roadcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
The blizzard of words in Condoleezza Rice's testimony Thursday did not resolve central points about what the government knew, should have known, did and should have done before the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks.

Says who?!

12 posted on 04/08/2004 4:19:17 PM PDT by Reagan Man (The choice is clear. Reelect BUSH-CHENEY !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: facedown
I had to laugh that a mob lawyer--ben veniste--was the rats major spokesman--kind of appropriate.
13 posted on 04/08/2004 4:22:05 PM PDT by rodguy911
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
Don't they even have enough intellegence to come up with a new lie? After Bush released ALL his military records, the big DNC directed spin line was "This just raises more questions that it answers". These "reporters" are pure DNC directs scum. Notice how the initial reporting was pretty positive and now that the DNC Talking points have been emailed out, the coverage is turning? These people have ZERO crediblity or intellectual honesty
14 posted on 04/08/2004 4:23:38 PM PDT by MNJohnnie (Vote Bush 2004-We have the solutions, Kerry Democrats? Nothing but slogans.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
Being this is an AP story, I'm assuming it's a news article and not an op-ed. Re-read the first sentence. That is a statement of fact. Can anyone tell me what is the least bit objective about that sentence?
15 posted on 04/08/2004 4:26:39 PM PDT by cincinnati65 (Rooting for the Panthers since 1995.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
Way to Go! Condoleezza Rice didn't budge an inch from how things really are.
I'm proud of her.
16 posted on 04/08/2004 4:32:20 PM PDT by austinmark (*Never Underestimate the Power of Stupid People in Large Groups.*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
After Rice testimony, questions remain

Yes Calvin they do. Questions remain. Like what did the i42 administration know, and when did it know it?

Maddy, Cohen, Berger, Reno, et. al.. have a stellar record. Right Calvin? The Kobar towers, WTC #1, OK City, embassies, the Cole, etc..And where the heck is algore, or Free, and I haven't heard anything from the Hidabeast? I'm sure their testimony would be helpful, right Calvin?

5.56mm

17 posted on 04/08/2004 4:41:18 PM PDT by M Kehoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Guys, to make this a victory, you have to turn it into a victory. It won't be by logic or persuasion of those who will hear what they want to hear.

It requires taking advantage of the situation to make an end run around their defense.

BCRW BCRW

We have a Black Conservative Republican Woman center stage and looking very good. The key here is to talk about how good she looked, how sharp, how representative she is about all that is good about Black America. How she is prototype of the coming wave of Black American women.

It's about votes, people. Always. No exceptions. And this is a chance to peel 5-10% off of Kerry's black vote and have W come in with 20-25% in November. Just 5% of the black vote stripped off of them will leave the Democrats losing forever.
18 posted on 04/08/2004 4:44:30 PM PDT by Owen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: M Kehoe
hidabeast=hildabeast (97, hillary, a/k/a fjb). I did proof read the post. OK? Spelling police?

5.56mm

19 posted on 04/08/2004 4:44:38 PM PDT by M Kehoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: facedown
cwoodward@ap.org
20 posted on 04/08/2004 4:49:15 PM PDT by jimbo123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson