Skip to comments.
After Rice testimony, questions remain
AP ^
| 4.8.04
| Calvin Woodard
Posted on 04/08/2004 4:02:35 PM PDT by ambrose
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
1
posted on
04/08/2004 4:02:35 PM PDT
by
ambrose
No, you morons.. you had your chance to ask your stupid questions... now it is time to turn out focus back to fighting the War on Terror.
2
posted on
04/08/2004 4:03:32 PM PDT
by
ambrose
("I actually did vote for the $87 billion before I voted against it" - John F. al-Query)
To: ambrose
3
posted on
04/08/2004 4:04:48 PM PDT
by
Mike Bates
(Artist Formerly Known as mikeb704.)
To: ambrose
After Rice Testimony, Questions Remain ...this is EXACTLY what Freepers were predicting on the live Condi thread today. Spin silk into a sow's ear. Ignore the brilliant truth.
4
posted on
04/08/2004 4:06:01 PM PDT
by
Sender
(Support Free Republic...become a monthly donor!)
To: All
5
posted on
04/08/2004 4:06:38 PM PDT
by
Support Free Republic
(I'd rather be sleeping. Let's get this over with so I can go back to sleep!)
To: ambrose
The AP has degenerated into a mere DNC mouthpiece, almost as jaundiced as Reuters.
6
posted on
04/08/2004 4:07:10 PM PDT
by
facedown
(Armed in the Heartland)
To: ambrose
"After Rice testimony, questions remain"
When you don't like the answers just claim that "questions remain".
7
posted on
04/08/2004 4:08:34 PM PDT
by
lews
To: ambrose
I have a question concerning the panel of ten. I had heard that the first time that Rice appeared before them, there were only five present.
Does anyone have a link or the information as to who was present the first time?
Thank You!
8
posted on
04/08/2004 4:13:16 PM PDT
by
Wake Up America
(who was in the first panel, the first time Rice testified?)
To: ambrose
The only question that remains is: By how many electoral votes will Lurch lose this fall?
9
posted on
04/08/2004 4:13:30 PM PDT
by
Young Rhino
(http://www.artofdivorce.com)
To: ambrose
After Rice testimony, questions remainAbout the only question I see that remains is: Why did the Dems believe that their demanding Condi Rice to testify in public wasn't going to blow up in their faces?
10
posted on
04/08/2004 4:14:04 PM PDT
by
dirtboy
(John Kerry - Hillary without the fat ankles and the FBI files...)
To: ambrose
This Calvin Woodward is an idiot.
He should playback the session or read the transcript.
Hamilton asks: "There are a lot of very, very fine _ 2 billion Muslims. Most of them, we know, are very fine people. Some don't like us; they hate us. They don't like what modernization does to their culture. They don't like the fact that economic prosperity has passed them by. They don't like some of the policies of the United States government. They don't like the way their own governments treat them..."
Rice replies: "... we're not going to see success on our watch. We will see some small victories on our watch. One of the most difficult problems in the Middle East is that the United States has been associated for a long time, decades, with a policy that looks the other way on the freedom deficit in the Middle East, that looks the other way at the absence of individual liberties in the Middle East. And I think that that has tended to alienate us from the populations of the Middle East..."
Don't blame us. Blame the terrorists (yes, those "very fine people"). We can't easily change them - it'll take many years. But we can focus on the War on Terror and obliterate the terrorists who want to obliterate us!
11
posted on
04/08/2004 4:17:35 PM PDT
by
roadcat
To: ambrose
The blizzard of words in Condoleezza Rice's testimony Thursday did not resolve central points about what the government knew, should have known, did and should have done before the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks.Says who?!
12
posted on
04/08/2004 4:19:17 PM PDT
by
Reagan Man
(The choice is clear. Reelect BUSH-CHENEY !)
To: facedown
I had to laugh that a mob lawyer--ben veniste--was the rats major spokesman--kind of appropriate.
To: ambrose
Don't they even have enough intellegence to come up with a new lie? After Bush released ALL his military records, the big DNC directed spin line was "This just raises more questions that it answers". These "reporters" are pure DNC directs scum. Notice how the initial reporting was pretty positive and now that the DNC Talking points have been emailed out, the coverage is turning? These people have ZERO crediblity or intellectual honesty
14
posted on
04/08/2004 4:23:38 PM PDT
by
MNJohnnie
(Vote Bush 2004-We have the solutions, Kerry Democrats? Nothing but slogans.)
To: ambrose
Being this is an AP story, I'm assuming it's a news article and not an op-ed. Re-read the first sentence. That is a statement of fact. Can anyone tell me what is the least bit objective about that sentence?
15
posted on
04/08/2004 4:26:39 PM PDT
by
cincinnati65
(Rooting for the Panthers since 1995.......)
To: ambrose
Way to Go! Condoleezza Rice didn't budge an inch from how things really are.
I'm proud of her.
16
posted on
04/08/2004 4:32:20 PM PDT
by
austinmark
(*Never Underestimate the Power of Stupid People in Large Groups.*)
To: ambrose
After Rice testimony, questions remain Yes Calvin they do. Questions remain. Like what did the i42 administration know, and when did it know it?
Maddy, Cohen, Berger, Reno, et. al.. have a stellar record. Right Calvin? The Kobar towers, WTC #1, OK City, embassies, the Cole, etc..And where the heck is algore, or Free, and I haven't heard anything from the Hidabeast? I'm sure their testimony would be helpful, right Calvin?
5.56mm
17
posted on
04/08/2004 4:41:18 PM PDT
by
M Kehoe
To: All
Guys, to make this a victory, you have to turn it into a victory. It won't be by logic or persuasion of those who will hear what they want to hear.
It requires taking advantage of the situation to make an end run around their defense.
BCRW BCRW
We have a Black Conservative Republican Woman center stage and looking very good. The key here is to talk about how good she looked, how sharp, how representative she is about all that is good about Black America. How she is prototype of the coming wave of Black American women.
It's about votes, people. Always. No exceptions. And this is a chance to peel 5-10% off of Kerry's black vote and have W come in with 20-25% in November. Just 5% of the black vote stripped off of them will leave the Democrats losing forever.
18
posted on
04/08/2004 4:44:30 PM PDT
by
Owen
To: M Kehoe
hidabeast=hildabeast (97, hillary, a/k/a fjb). I did proof read the post. OK? Spelling police?
5.56mm
19
posted on
04/08/2004 4:44:38 PM PDT
by
M Kehoe
To: facedown
20
posted on
04/08/2004 4:49:15 PM PDT
by
jimbo123
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson