Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Technoman
I believe that this is consistent with the law in all 50 states. You can only use deadly force to protect your life or the lives of others. You cannot use deadly force to protect or preserve your property. I don't think that you can blame this on "California"; it would be the same anywhere.
9 posted on 04/08/2004 9:05:28 AM PDT by RonF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: RonF
I think I've read of some states where you can use deadly force to protect property.
12 posted on 04/08/2004 9:09:31 AM PDT by TheDon (John Kerry, self proclaimed war criminal, Democratic Presidential nominee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: RonF
You cannot use deadly force to protect or preserve your property

Around here it's called 'saving the taxpayers some money'.

16 posted on 04/08/2004 9:16:18 AM PDT by BlazingArizona
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson