Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: WhiteyAppleseed
Actually, being in the Navy myself, I can assure you that security forces afloat are quite a bit better prepared.

As for the number of boats around, any getting within the ship's "safe zone" without proper clearance (and only a harbor tug would have this...not a raft or rowboat) would find its day solidly ruined.

15 posted on 04/07/2004 7:01:09 PM PDT by Long Cut (Hell of a thing, killin' a man. You take away all he's got, and all he's ever gonna have)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: Long Cut
Glad to hear it. I was on the Hepburn (and the McCain DDG-36--carried the national ensign during the decommissioning, color guard). We were getting ready to leave Hunter's Point in '78 when a tug backed into us. The tug had moved the Fanning from the quay wall in front of us--why--I don't know. "Flooding, flooding, flooding in the boiler room" took on new meaning. The five foot dent was repaired quickly, unlike the 19 month yard period.
20 posted on 04/07/2004 7:13:39 PM PDT by WhiteyAppleseed (The levity of the doomed has no equal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: Long Cut
My station when we would get underway was on the bridge. Going in and out of port exposes a vessel to all sorts of boats, some fast, some slow, big, small, low-flying aircraft, etc. Seems like it would be difficult, in reality, to protect against a determined effort.
22 posted on 04/07/2004 7:17:22 PM PDT by WhiteyAppleseed (The levity of the doomed has no equal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson