Skip to comments.
Libertarianism in One Lesson
Critiques of Libertarianism ^
| 1-4-2003
| Mike Huben
Posted on 04/07/2004 11:22:53 AM PDT by jmc813
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 361-380, 381-400, 401-420, 421-433 last
To: Sweet Land
You left out the transportation costs in your "23 fold" markup. Considerable amount.
421
posted on
04/09/2004 7:57:55 AM PDT
by
cinFLA
To: cinFLA
You left out the transportation costsAs have you from every discussion of bottled water.
in your "23 fold" markup. Considerable amount.
Considerable, my left cheek; how much would FedEx charge to ship that brick of heroin from SE Asia to New York? Anywhere remotely close to the $67,000 by which its price goes up?
422
posted on
04/09/2004 8:10:17 AM PDT
by
Sweet Land
(http://www.savingangel.org)
To: Sweet Land
Considerable, my left cheek; how much would FedEx charge to ship that brick of heroin from SE Asia to New York? Anywhere remotely close to the $67,000 by which its price goes up? Part of the considerable amount is listed in your source. Do your own homework.
423
posted on
04/09/2004 8:20:18 AM PDT
by
cinFLA
To: cinFLA
Considerable, my left cheek; how much would FedEx charge to ship that brick of heroin from SE Asia to New York? Anywhere remotely close to the $67,000 by which its price goes up? Part of the considerable amount is listed in your source. Do your own homework.
Do you mean this?
"A typical smuggling fee of $37,500 is commonly charged by heroin smugglers to transport heroin of any amount from the Gulf of Thailand to Hong Kong by ship or fishing trawler, and delivery is made within 8 to 10 days.
"The fee for smuggling heroin from Bangkok to New York can go as high as $5,000 to $10,000 per unit, according to DEA intelligence reports."
That doesn't address my question, which is about legal shipment of heroin. (You are aware that FedEx is not a smuggling operation, I hope?) The grossly inflated shipping costs support my point that heroin prices would plummet if it were legal.
424
posted on
04/09/2004 8:51:13 AM PDT
by
Sweet Land
(http://www.savingangel.org)
To: jmc813
Cholmondley Frampton-Blythe was a W.C. Fields' character. Some others included Filthy McNasty, J. Pinkerton Snoopington, Sir Mortimer Fortescue, Eustace McGargle, and about 50 others.
To: jmc813; cinFLA
jmc813 -- Those two going at it remind me of Bele and Lokai in the Star Trek episode, "Let that be your last battlefield".
To: robertpaulsen
IOW, you & I seem to be talking at cross purposes. It happens.
To: robertpaulsen; jmc813
I look much better in a snug gray sleeper than either of those guys.
428
posted on
04/09/2004 9:23:08 AM PDT
by
Sweet Land
(http://www.savingangel.org)
To: Sweet Land
Posted by Sweet Land: 2004 9:25:54 AM Delta = 166 Seconds 0:2:164
Posted by Sweet Land: 2004 9:23:08 AM Delta = 327 Seconds 0:5:322
Posted by Sweet Land: 2004 9:17:41 AM Delta = 1110 Seconds 0:18:1092
Posted by Sweet Land: 2004 8:59:11 AM Delta = 182 Seconds 0:3:179
Posted by Sweet Land: 2004 8:56:09 AM Delta = 296 Seconds 0:4:292
Posted by Sweet Land: 2004 8:51:13 AM Delta = 2456 Seconds 0:40:2416
Posted by Sweet Land: 2004 8:10:17 AM Delta = 1206 Seconds 0:20:1186
Posted by Sweet Land: 2004 7:50:11 AM Delta = 207 Seconds 0:3:204
Posted by Sweet Land: 2004 7:46:44 AM Delta = 263 Seconds 0:4:259
Posted by Sweet Land: 2004 7:42:21 AM Delta = 255 Seconds 0:4:251
Posted by Sweet Land: 2004 7:38:06 AM Delta = 193 Seconds 0:3:190
Posted by Sweet Land: 2004 7:34:53 AM Delta = 80 Seconds 0:1:79
Posted by Sweet Land: 2004 7:33:33 AM Delta = 235 Seconds 0:3:232
Posted by Sweet Land: 2004 7:29:38 AM Delta = 440 Seconds 0:7:433
Posted by Sweet Land: 2004 7:22:18 AM Delta = 145 Seconds 0:2:143
Posted by Sweet Land: 2004 7:19:53 AM Delta = 448 Seconds 0:7:441
Posted by Sweet Land: 2004 7:12:25 AM Delta = 298 Seconds 0:4:294
Posted by Sweet Land: 2004 7:07:27 AM Delta = 753 Seconds 0:12:741
Posted by Sweet Land: 2004 6:54:54 AM Delta = 1977 Seconds 0:32:1945
Posted by Sweet Land: 2004 6:21:57 AM Delta = 592 Seconds 0:9:583
Posted by Sweet Land: 2004 6:12:05 AM Delta = 142 Seconds 0:2:140
Posted by Sweet Land: 2004 6:09:43 AM Delta = 103 Seconds 0:1:102
Posted by Sweet Land: 2004 6:08:00 AM Delta = 82 Seconds 0:1:81
Posted by Sweet Land: 2004 6:06:38 AM Delta = 78 Seconds 0:1:77
Posted by Sweet Land: 2004 6:05:20 AM Delta = 64 Seconds 0:1:63
Posted by Sweet Land: 2004 6:04:16 AM Delta = 83 Seconds 0:1:82
429
posted on
04/09/2004 10:14:13 AM PDT
by
cinFLA
To: cinFLA
Thanks for your implicit admission that I've won the debate.
430
posted on
04/09/2004 10:17:06 AM PDT
by
Sweet Land
(http://www.savingangel.org)
To: Sweet Land
Thanks for your implicit admission that I've won the debate. I will post it once more. Bottled water has a higher markup than heroin. If fact, McDonalds marks up their french fries on the order of the markup you mentioned for heroin.
431
posted on
04/09/2004 3:35:56 PM PDT
by
cinFLA
To: cinFLA
Post those claims as often as you like; as I've shown, they're not true.
432
posted on
04/12/2004 6:24:07 AM PDT
by
Sweet Land
(http://www.savingangel.org)
To: jmc813
Well, aren't you the idiot.
433
posted on
04/12/2004 6:27:12 AM PDT
by
Old Mountain man
(Trust a democrat to do what is right and good for you!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 361-380, 381-400, 401-420, 421-433 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson