To: lowbridge
BTW, regardless of what, if anything, is up for April 9, it's worth noting that it's not very encouraging if both Al-Sistani and Al-Hakim have turned against us. Not that those Iranian proxies were ever all that reliable, but still..
6 posted on
04/06/2004 10:54:58 PM PDT by
AntiGuv
(When the countdown hits zero, something's gonna happen..)
To: AntiGuv
Sadar is most likely the one responsible for the death of Hakim's brother in that explosion awhile back. He may be on Sadar's side because he's a creep, but it may also be because he's in fear of his life.
Al Sistani is in extreme danger and I hope our guys are watching out for him. He's a survivor but Sadar wouldn't even blink an eye having him killed as well. Sistani knows this.
13 posted on
04/06/2004 11:17:05 PM PDT by
McGavin999
(Expecting others to pay for your enjoyment of FreeRepublic is socialism: Donate now!)
To: AntiGuv
If I were Sistani I would think twice about meeting with Sadr. He should recall what happened to the other cleric who met with Sadr. He sort of got dead. Shall we take bets on whether Sistani meets the same fate?
14 posted on
04/06/2004 11:23:18 PM PDT by
WVNan
(Kill the Freepathons- BECOME A MONTHLY DONOR)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson