Replies

The White House didn't look at whether Clark wrote the truth or not ..

The book was reviewed for national security reasons and to make sure no sensitive information was given out .. that is not uncommon

Karen Hugh's book was reviewed in the same way and if I recall, Karen said the only thing they took out of her book was a phone number

The White House didn't look at whether Clark wrote the truth or not...

You're correct - national security is/was their only concern. Also, I had read that they were not under oath for that hearing and Dr. Rice will not be under oath for Thursday's hearing.

I have heard Ben Vineste has leaked parts of Dr. Rice's four hour hearing in which he did not attend.

The media is now having a cow over President Bush and Vice President Cheney appearing together/at the same time for their hearing. No respect to the fact that they are even testifying.

BTW When I put this thru spell check 'Cheney' comes up as a mispelled and my choice is 'Chaney'. I checked with my bumper sticker and my way is correct. Where do I report abuse!!!

Can we draw an analogy to the notarization of a document? The notary is simply certifying that the person who signed the document is really who he says he is, rather than certifying that the contents of the document are truthful (?)