To: My2Cents; Eddie Dean
if the other side would agree to it, I'd take it.It'd be a good start, that's for sure. But, the "reproductive rights" advocates are correct to warn their legions that it won't stop there.
At any rate, God is love and He is sovereign.
15 posted on
04/06/2004 2:49:23 PM PDT by
newgeezer
(Just my opinion, of course. Your mileage may vary. You have the right to be wrong.)
To: newgeezer
I'm all for "reproductive rights," too. A woman should be able to exercise a choice as to whether she will conceive. Once conception has taken place, there is another set of rights that need to be considered.
16 posted on
04/06/2004 2:54:31 PM PDT by
My2Cents
("Well...there you go again.")
To: newgeezer
But, the "reproductive rights" advocates are correct to warn their legions that it won't stop there. Yes they are. And rightfully so...
Those that would not make provision for forced conception (rape) need a little introspection.
There's no reason why the 'fairer sex' can not live up to the same post-coital responsibilities that we demand of menfolk - but when one's free will re: pregnancy has been subjugated, matters change.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson