Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: My2Cents; Eddie Dean
if the other side would agree to it, I'd take it.

It'd be a good start, that's for sure. But, the "reproductive rights" advocates are correct to warn their legions that it won't stop there.

At any rate, God is love and He is sovereign.

15 posted on 04/06/2004 2:49:23 PM PDT by newgeezer (Just my opinion, of course. Your mileage may vary. You have the right to be wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: newgeezer
I'm all for "reproductive rights," too. A woman should be able to exercise a choice as to whether she will conceive. Once conception has taken place, there is another set of rights that need to be considered.
16 posted on 04/06/2004 2:54:31 PM PDT by My2Cents ("Well...there you go again.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: newgeezer
But, the "reproductive rights" advocates are correct to warn their legions that it won't stop there.

Yes they are. And rightfully so...

Those that would not make provision for forced conception (rape) need a little introspection.

There's no reason why the 'fairer sex' can not live up to the same post-coital responsibilities that we demand of menfolk - but when one's free will re: pregnancy has been subjugated, matters change.

19 posted on 04/06/2004 3:19:58 PM PDT by Eddie Dean
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson