Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

"This reminds us of the 1930's"
Jerusalem Post ^ | Apr. 6, 2004 | JPOST.COM STAFF

Posted on 04/06/2004 11:40:52 AM PDT by yonif

A fire destroyed library books and damaged a library computer system at the St. Laurent branch of United Talmud Torahs (UTT) elementary school on the eve of the Passover holiday (April 5), and police found anti-Semitic notes, written in French taped to the school's walls.

Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin confirmed that the school, which was closed at the time of the blaze Monday, was firebombed. In a statement, Martin said, "the assault was not directed against the Jewish community of Montreal. It is an act of violence directed at all Canadians and one to which we must collectively respond."

Montreal police spokesman Yves Surprenant refused to say how the blaze started or provide details about the notes' contents, except to say they were signed by an unknown organization. But the Canadian Jewish News reported on its website that a firebomb was thrown through a window, and traces of accelerant were found in the building.

Surprenant said it was "the most deplorable act"' he has seen in 24 years on the force.

"What was written on the notes really told us it was a hate crime," he said.

Professor Nitza Perry, a representative of the Jewish community in Montreal, told Army Radio that she met with some Holocaust survivors Tuesday following the attack. "They are panicking. This reminds them of the [nineteen] thirties. Where they burn books, they burn people, the survivors told me," Perry said.

Quebec's French-language TVA television network reported that the notes denounced recent Israeli attacks against Palestinians, including the killing of Sheik Ahmed Yassin, founder of Hamas.

CTV News quoted a portion of the letter Monday: "Our goal was only to sound the alarm without causing deaths. . . .but this is just a beginning. If your crimes continue in the Middle East, our attacks will continue."

"The media are reporting that police found anti-Semitic notes at the scene, but the police are neither confirming nor denying this, saying the investigation would be compromised if details were leaked."

"Canada is multicultural, a really pleasant place. This place is like a mosaic with people coming here from all over the world. There are Israelis, Koreans, Muslims Pakistanis and Indians and many others. But I think there was some naivety here unfortunately.

"The Quebec area has more anti-Semitism than the rest of Canada; maybe it's the relationship to France, and the immigrants from Tunisia, Algeria and Morocco," she said. "The Muslim community has tripled here," Perry added.

Sidney Benudiz, head of the school, called the fire "an act of terrorism, plain and simple." He said the school has had some graffiti and minor vandalism in the past.

Martin said the firebombing was an "attack on freedom."

Setting fire to "a place of learning, where young children gather is an offense against all that Canadians cherish," the prime minister said.

Rabbi Reuben Poupko, co-chair of the Jewish community security co-ordinating committee, urged the community not to alter its normal activities in the wake of a firebombing that seriously damaged a Jewish school on the eve of Passover, the Canadian Jewish News reported on its Internet edition.

"We intend not to grant these criminals a victory by amending the way we live because of this act. We will continue to congregate in our synagogues and educate our children in Jewish schools. We will determine how we live live, not them," he told the CJN.

B'nai Brith Canada League for Human Rights chair Stephen Scheinberg said the incident points to Montreal Jewish institutions' being "woefully unprepared," reported the CJN. He said the community should be looking at what is being done in Europe and Latin America, where round-the-clock guards and physical barriers are common practice at Jewish buildings. "This is a wake-up call," he told the Canadian Jewish News.

The attack follows a recent spate of anti-Semitic violence in Toronto.

Three Toronto teenagers were charged after several vandals toppled headstones at a Jewish cemetery and spray-painted anti-Semitic slogans on a synagogue. In a separate incident, a 46-year-old man was arrested after a Star of David, an equal sign and a swastika were sprayed on construction boarding in west-end Toronto.

Justice Minister Irwin Cotler, who attended a branch of the Talmud school, said the attack was part of increased trend in anti-Semitism, both in Canada and worldwide.

Canada "will not be silent and we will not be intimated and we will act and we will bring the full force of law to bear against those who would commit these cowardly acts of racist, hate crimes," he said.

Montreal Mayor Gerald Tremblay promised an increased police presence at Jewish institutions during the holiday period.

Last month, B'nai Brith Canada reported an increase in anti-Semitic incidents across the country in 2003, saying there were almost 600 cases of violence, harassment and vandalism against Jews and over 100 such incidents in Quebec alone.

At sundown Monday, Jews around the world began observances of the weeklong Passover festival, commemorating the flight of the ancient Israelites from bondage in Egypt, as described in the Old Testament.

With AP


TOPICS: Canada; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: antisemitism; canada; hc2; jihadincanuckistan; montreal; passover; zionist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last

1 posted on 04/06/2004 11:40:53 AM PDT by yonif
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: yonif
Just have them write a letter to France telling them you are angry and might invade. They will surrender and the problem will be solved.
2 posted on 04/06/2004 11:46:23 AM PDT by chance33_98 (Shall a living man complain? Oh how much fewer are my sufferings than my sins;)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Donate Here By Secure Server
3 posted on 04/06/2004 11:46:49 AM PDT by Support Free Republic (Don't be a nuancy boy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
You know, I have been know to think the best of people and sometimes I'm a little slow on people's motives, but would someone please explain to me WHY this kind of stuff happens. What is up with the Jewish hate? I just don't get it at all.

If someone were to take out an Islamic School at least we have a motive in 9/11. Not that it's a good thing, but at least it's explainable.

4 posted on 04/06/2004 11:49:26 AM PDT by netmilsmom (Busybody of Free Republic)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yonif

5 posted on 04/06/2004 11:54:28 AM PDT by adam_az (Call your state Republican party office and VOLUNTEER FOR A CAMPAIGN!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yonif
There is one huge difference between Canada today and Germany in the 1930s. In Germany the thugs were quite open about their attacks and operated with tacit approval from the government while the anti-semitic thugs in Canada have to sneak around at night. They didn't just offend the Jews- virtually everyone here is outraged.
6 posted on 04/06/2004 11:54:33 AM PDT by Squawk 8888 (Earth first! We can mine the other planets later.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yonif
"The Quebec area has more anti-Semitism than the rest of Canada; maybe it's the relationship to France, and the immigrants from Tunisia, Algeria and Morocco," she said. "The Muslim community has tripled here," Perry added.

Canadians are setting themselves up for the Daniel Pearl Treatment.

7 posted on 04/06/2004 11:55:25 AM PDT by Free ThinkerNY ((((Beware the Trojan Horse of Islam))))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Squawk 8888
It is reassuring that the entire community is outraged and feels offended. But make no mistake. The fire bombers' target was Jews, pure and simple. Unless that can be acknowledged and vociferously condemned, you will only help sweep under the carpet the nature of the violent contingent you have brewing in your midst. Remember, it always starts with the Jews. But it never ends there.

8 posted on 04/06/2004 12:04:51 PM PDT by Inkie (Surround Fallujia and start shooting.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY
It's probably both. Muslims for the obvious reason, but the French Quebecois, more so the separatist set, tend to have a more anti-semitic slant. Jacques Parizeau, after the defeat of the Secession Referendum in 1995, blamed the Jews for the failure.

I dated a Franco-Quebecoise for a couple years, and while she wasn't at all malicious (which is probably a good thing since I'm a Hebrew), she did have some serious misconceptions about Jews in general.
9 posted on 04/06/2004 12:27:58 PM PDT by Guvmint_Cheese
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: yonif
Weimar Republic, Elections

Fall of the Weimar Republic

1929 Germany is ruled by a grand coalition stretching from the Social Democrats to the Peoples Party and the Social Democrat Muller is Chancelor. Unemployment is rising and the unemployment insurance is in heavy deficit. The Social Democrats want to increase employer's contributions while the People's Party want to cut benefits. A compromise is patched together.

1930 Rising unemployment puts the unemployment insurance into greater crisis. Meyer of the Democrats and Bruning of the Centre Party propose a new compromise. Three of the four Social Democrat Ministers accept the compromise but the Social Democrat group in the Reichstag rejects it. On 27th March Muller resigns as Chancellor.

30th March Bruning forms a minority government. By including a program of agricultural support he gets the National Party to vote for the government - against the wishes of the National Party leader, Hugenberg.

July Bruning's government proposes a finance package in response to the growing economic crisis. The Nationalists are divided but mainly against. Bruning needs Social Democrat support and the Social Democrat offers this on condition of changes. Bruning rejects the compromise and the measure is defeated. Bruning then goes to the President, the conservative Hindenburg, and imposes the finance reforms by emergency decree under Article 48. Article 48, intended to be used only in times when security and public order were seriously disrupted or imperilled (but this was never defined) gave the President far reaching powers. The Social Democrats move suspension of the decree which passes. Bruning asks the President to dissolve the Reichstag.

14th September. Elections are held while unemployment is around 3 million. The Nazis make sweeping gains and smaller gains are made by the Communists. To form a new coalition now would need everyone from the Social Democrats to the right wing 'splinter' parties. Bruning knowing he can rely on Article 48 dosn't even try. From now on Germany ceases to be a parliamentary regime but Presidential regime ruling through the Chancellor appointed by the President. Bruning now imposes a policy of deflation which the Social Democrats reluctantly 'tolerate' by voting against motions suspending the decrees. Unemployment continues to rise.

March/April 1932: Hindenburg's term expires. Bruning persuades him to stand again. The Social Democrats and the Democrats support him as the lesser evil and he is elected on the second ballot - but Hitler gains 37%.

13th April: In response to growing NAZI violence Bruning's government persuades Hindenburg (very reluctantly) to ban the SA.

June 1932: Hindenburg fed up with issuing unpopular decrees on Bruning's behalf replaces him by von Papen. Papen, reactionary, stupid and arrogant, was however an officer and fine horseman and so the ideal Chancellor in the eyes of the ageing President.

Papen meets Hitler and Hitler hints that the Nazis might support the new government in exchange for lifting of the ban on the SA and new elections. Papen falls for it and the Reichstag is dissolved (4th June).

20th July Presidential rule is imposed on the Prussian Land - using SA-communist clashes as a pretext. This gives the Chancellor direct control of the police force of 2/3rds of Germany.

31st July Elections to the Reichstag. Hitler makes sweeping gains. The Nazis, along with the communists have a blocking majority in the Reichstag and as Hitler breaks his promise to support Papen once again Germany is ruled by emergency decree.

12th September The new Reichstag meets. The communists move to repeal one of the emergency decrees and to no-confidence the government. Papen, to forestall this, attempts to immediately dissolve the Reichstag but not before the vote is counted - 512-42 against the government. The new elections show some losses for Hitler but gains by the communists keep the Reichstag deadlocked.

By now Germany is already a Presidential dictatorship in which any attempt to oppose the emergency decrees by the Reichstag will be met by dissolution. However Papen loses the support of his cabinet and Hindenburg reluctantly agrees to Papen's resignation.

2 Dec 1932: Schleicher, former friend of Papen and former minister heads the new government. Papen then , driven by a desire for revenge, seeks out Hitler. Hitler demands the Chancelorship, the Ministry of Interior, and Commissioner for Prussia. Papen wants to be Prussian Commissioner himself but offers the Interior Ministry of Prussia. As this is what Hitler really wanted he agrees and all that is required now is to get the consent of the virtually senile Hindenburg.

Jan 30 1933: Hindenburg appoints Hitler as Chancellor.

March 1933: During the election campaign massive intimidation by the SA means that only, apart from the Nazis, only the Nationalists are able to campaign. The Prussian police, now under Nazi control, employs 50,000 'auxiliaries' who are mainly SA to be used against the opposition. Many Nazi opponents are beaten up , some 50 killed. Despite this the Nazis only get 43.9% of the vote but with the Nationalists they have a majority. With the election over the communists are banned and their Riechstag deputies arrested.

23rd March: An enabling act giving dictatorial powers to Hitler's government is put to the Reichstag. A 2/3rds majority is required and 2/3rds of the Riechstag must be present. However along with the Nationalists, the Peoples Party and the Catholics vote for. The Democrats (all five of them ) are split but decide to vote for, on the grounds that as Hitler is going to establish a dictatorship anyway it is better to let him do it legally. Only those Social Democrats who attended (many are already under arrest) have the courage to vote against.

My main source for this page was "A history of the Weimar Republic" by Erich Eyck. Extra details from "The Hundred Days to Hitler", R Manvell and H Frankel and "German Liberalism and the disolution of the Weimar Party system" by L Jones.

10 posted on 04/06/2004 1:00:39 PM PDT by vannrox (The Preamble to the Bill of Rights - without it, our Bill of Rights is meaningless!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: netmilsmom
"...would someone please explain to me WHY this kind of stuff happens. What is up with the Jewish hate? I just don't get it at all. "

Israel made a covenant with God. For that the world hates them.

Israel broke their side of the covenant by refusing to listen to the prophets when they told them about Jesus. For that God temporarily removed his protection.

God still has plans for Israel in the end times. For that the world hates them.

Islam perhaps more than any other false relition takes specific aim at the Jews and instructs their followers to hate them.

11 posted on 04/06/2004 1:37:18 PM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: DannyTN
>>For that the world hates them. <<

I don't.
12 posted on 04/06/2004 1:41:37 PM PDT by netmilsmom (Busybody of Free Republic)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: netmilsmom
"I don't."

I don't either. But that's the source of it. It is Satanic in origin. Satan works hard to influence man to be at war with God.

13 posted on 04/06/2004 1:44:16 PM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: yonif
"the assault was not directed against the Jewish community of Montreal.

The hell it wasn't.

It is an act of violence directed at all Canadians

No, just the Jews...I see no evidence at all that it was directed against "all Canadians".

and one to which we must collectively respond." The collective response part is good. But I can't have full confidence in its success until the Prime Minister gets himself a clue.

14 posted on 04/06/2004 1:51:26 PM PDT by hellinahandcart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dennisw; Cachelot; Yehuda; Nix 2; veronica; Catspaw; knighthawk; Alouette; Optimist; weikel; ...
If you'd like to be on or off this middle east/political ping list, please FR mail me.
15 posted on 04/06/2004 1:59:10 PM PDT by SJackson (A fear of weapons is a sign of retarded sexual and emotional maturity, Sigmund Freud)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: yonif
"The Quebec area has more anti-Semitism than the rest of Canada; maybe it's the relationship to France, and the immigrants from Tunisia, Algeria and Morocco," she said. "The Muslim community has tripled here," Perry added.

Throw in "the Quiet Revolution" of the 60s, where people decided en masse to stop going to church and start worshipping socialism, and suddenly, we have a theory here.

Something is always going to rush in to fill a moral or religious vaccuum, and folks usually aren't going to like what it is...

16 posted on 04/06/2004 1:59:12 PM PDT by hellinahandcart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY
Seriously, is anyone tracking the sales of swords and the demographic characteristics of such sales? [As for me, I am prepared for the worst, and there will be no unopposed sword attacks in my back 40! If anyone tries a Daniel Pearl job around here, well, then..... ]
17 posted on 04/06/2004 2:03:36 PM PDT by GOP_1900AD (Un-PC even to "Conservatives!" - Right makes right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: DannyTN
Israel broke their side of the covenant by refusing to listen to the prophets when they told them about Jesus. For that God temporarily removed his protection.

You don't even want to begin to go there. Unless your aim is to start a fight between Christians and Jews, keep opinions like that to yourself.

18 posted on 04/06/2004 2:05:48 PM PDT by thoughtomator (Voting Bush because there is no reasonable alternative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
I have always suspected, but cannot prove, that Bruning was a Nazi mole.
19 posted on 04/06/2004 2:06:49 PM PDT by GOP_1900AD (Un-PC even to "Conservatives!" - Right makes right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: thoughtomator
"You don't even want to begin to go there. Unless your aim is to start a fight between Christians and Jews, keep opinions like that to yourself."

Well starting a fight with Jews is certainly not my desire.

But Jews do need to answer for themselves why they were sent back into exile. I've voiced my opinion and if they have a different one, then so be it. But I'm not doing the Jews any favors if I let the question of why go unasked.

20 posted on 04/06/2004 2:09:50 PM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson