Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Molly Ivins: Dont blame Bushies for pollution; pin it on illegals
Pasadena Star-News ^ | 05 April 2004 | Molly Ivins

Posted on 04/05/2004 4:59:29 PM PDT by MegaSilver

Well! If you have never seen a flock of enraged birders, you don't know what danger is. These people don't just watch pewits and tweety-birds, they're into raptors, too falcons, eagles ... they know how to swoop and strike. If we find Rove beaten to a pulp with binoculars, it will be no surprise. How could he ignore the immemorial warning, "Beware the wrath of the birding legions!'

Back to business. There's no way to keep up with the Bush administration's assaults on the environment, they're just endless. Most notable lately was the decision to let mercury pollution, which is extremely toxic, continue. With current technology, we could cut mercury emissions by 90 percent in four years. Instead, the Bushies chose a plan that will reduce it by 50 percent over 14 years, thus saving millions for their big campaign contributors in the power, coal and chemical industries. To make up for it, they warned pregnant women not to eat tuna. But that's not all:

The U.S. Forest Service is going to eliminate any reviews of its actions by outside agencies for compliance with clean water, endangered species and historical preservation laws.

The Department of Energy is moving to overturn a court decision on standards to clean up the country's most toxic and radioactive waste.

The Environmental Protection Agency's inspector general has concluded that senior Bushies at EPA have repeatedly made misleading statements about purported improvements in drinking water quality. (Oh no, not Bushies lying!)

Other actions way too numerous to mention here can be found on the Web sites of assorted environmental groups.

To counter this ghastly record, the GOP put out a "talking points' memo for Republican members of Congress. In it, the congressmen are advised to inform their constituents that: A) global warming has not been proved, B) there are no clear links between childhood asthma and air pollution (in what I assume was an unintentionally hilarious slip, the memo advises R's that the links are "cloudy'), and C) America's rivers and lakes aren't nearly as polluted as the EPA says they are. The EPA says at least 40 percent of our streams, rivers and lakes are too polluted for drinking, fishing or swimming.

Sen. Jim Jeffords of Vermont observed: "It's so incredible that they have this denial of any responsibility for the serious situation we have in this country as far as the environment goes. They have a head-in- the-sand approach to it. They're just sloughing off the human health impacts the premature deaths and asthma attacks caused by power plant pollution.'

One of the weirdest environmental developments of late is the attempt by right-wing anti- immigrant groups to take over the venerable Sierra Club. The latest fad among these anti-immigrant groups, many of which have ties to disgusting racist groups, is to blame immigrants for our environmental problems.

I see a lot of Mexican immigrants, and some must be illegal, gardening in this country, but I don't know of many who run power plants that spew tons of mercury into the air. You hardly ever see an illegal Mexican immigrant on a snowmobile in Yellowstone. Illegal Mexicans are seldom in charge of timber companies that want to clear-cut the national forests. It's not often that illegal Mexicans run chemical companies that dump toxins into rivers and wetlands. It's rare to find an illegal Mexican in the Bush administration deciding to end the Superfund cleanup program or to lower air and water quality standards.

I don't know about you, but I don't think we can pin this one on them. Reckon these folks have some other agenda?


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: aliens; bushwhacked; environment; illegalaliens; illegals; imbeciles; ivins; mollyivins

1 posted on 04/05/2004 4:59:30 PM PDT by MegaSilver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MegaSilver
With current technology, we could cut mercury emissions by 90 percent in four years. Instead, the Bushies chose a plan that will reduce it by 50 percent over 14 years, thus saving millions for their big campaign contributors in the power, coal and chemical industries.

So, what you're saying, Molly, is that the Bushies have a plan in place to reduce it by 50 percent more than Clinton did, and do it without financially overburdening the industry that keeps our country strong.

I don't have a problem with that.

2 posted on 04/05/2004 5:05:56 PM PDT by FlyVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MegaSilver
Hmmm....Molly Ivins? Wasn't there some study about cows and their flatulence a few years ago?
3 posted on 04/05/2004 5:06:21 PM PDT by gortklattu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

The Other Belly Girl


Donate Here By Secure Server

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794

or you can use

PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com

STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD-
It is in the breaking news sidebar!


4 posted on 04/05/2004 5:06:37 PM PDT by Support Free Republic (Hi Mom! Hi Dad!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MegaSilver
Expert on Fox News Said that Coal fired power plants are responsible for only one percent of the Mercury in The U.S. Echosphere.
5 posted on 04/05/2004 5:07:56 PM PDT by Retired Chemist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MegaSilver
Ivins's reasoning is laughable.

She saw some illegals gardening.

How did she know they were illegals?

She just ignores the argument that more Americans = more pollution.
6 posted on 04/05/2004 5:09:00 PM PDT by rogueleader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MegaSilver
Ivins must be babbling incoherently to the bartender again.


7 posted on 04/05/2004 5:12:41 PM PDT by ServesURight (FReecerely Yours,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MegaSilver
If the environazis had their way, what kind of word would we live in?

All we would able to do is sit around the yard and watch things grow...
8 posted on 04/05/2004 5:15:36 PM PDT by baltodog ("Never feel sorry for a man who owns his own plane.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MegaSilver
The latest fad among these anti-immigrant groups, many of which have ties to disgusting racist groups, is to blame immigrants for our environmental problems.

This, of course, is a bold faced lie. Notice how Molly provides absolutely no facts to back up her claim.

9 posted on 04/05/2004 5:20:52 PM PDT by judgeandjury
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rogueleader
Molly Ivins and Janet Reno they are a pair... With Maddy Alrbright they make a three-some... They imbide frequently the clinton's dirty bathwater...

And men; if it's determined you are lacking on judgement day; well this is your fate; having to live and satisfy these harridans in the after life for all of eternity...

NOW IF THAT'S NOT HELL; I DON'T KNOW WHAT IS!!!
10 posted on 04/05/2004 5:27:09 PM PDT by gatorgriz ("The world is full of bastards - the number ever increasing the further one gets from Missoula, MT")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: judgeandjury
Also, one of those running for the Sierra Club is Dick Lamm, former Democratic gov. of CO. See "The high-immigration Right is on the warpath" http://www.nationalreview.com/comment/krikorian200403310836.asp
11 posted on 04/05/2004 5:35:34 PM PDT by lonewacko_dot_com (http://lonewacko.com/blog)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: gatorgriz
Molly Ivins: Spermacide in high heels.
12 posted on 04/05/2004 5:40:43 PM PDT by Bluntpoint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: MegaSilver
I applaud when I see a rant on how "horrible" the President is for the environment. I applaud because I believe that the environmental movement has morphed into a useful tool for the nut-jobs that want to end capitalism. They use the arguments about the environment (they don't even have to be reasonable arguments anymore) as a stick in the wheel of free enterprise.

Thank God that we've got a President who has enough sense to be "bad for the environment."
13 posted on 04/05/2004 6:33:28 PM PDT by Jaysun (The early bird may get the worm, but the second mouse gets the cheese.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MegaSilver
(Begin satire) Napkin found at Gaia's Open Society Vegan Grill after group of effeminate men, lousy tippers stiffed server:

Bush economy failing: (false) Keep mentioning it but need to start looking elsewhere, unfortunately looks good

Bush quagmire in Iraq: (false) Good thing we didn't round file this last week. The deteriorating environment shows promise. Get dead body shots.

Bush killing Earth: (false) Let's ramp this up, use well-known buzzwords such as mercury, ozone, global warming. Might have legs.,p. Hillary: Keep all options open. Back burner. Focus on K.

Kool-Aid: Grape, full sugar. Paper cups. Notepads, pens.

14 posted on 04/05/2004 6:54:52 PM PDT by Sender (Support Free Republic...become a monthly donor!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: baltodog
If the environazis had their way, what kind of word would we live in?

Tom Clancy covered that in RAINBOW SIX

15 posted on 04/05/2004 9:37:08 PM PDT by gortklattu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: MegaSilver
Being a good far-lefty, Molly always takes as absolute truth the position of the most wacko, far-left, enviro-nuts. When someone comes along and produces a plan for something that can help the environment but not cripple industry and destroy jobs well of course according to Ivins "The Bushies are trying to destroy the environment, blah, blah, blah". This women would have been laughed out of town a long time ago or never been hired if we had normal standards of journalism. But of course there are a lot more where she came from. However she just might be the worst.
16 posted on 04/06/2004 3:23:18 AM PDT by driftless ( For life-long happiness, learn how to play the accordion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MegaSilver
From Tom Tancredo: "We require exhaustive environmental reviews when the federal government makes even the most minor of decisions like where to build a road or how many acres of brush to clear in a forest. So why shouldn't we require that same level of analysis to help Congress determine how many immigrants to let in? I hope that groups like the Sierra Club - who purport to care about the environment - are willing to stand behind their principles and support my bill."

Unlikely that will happen, Congressman Tancredo. As the people who promote open borders have no principles.

17 posted on 04/06/2004 11:57:24 AM PDT by swampfox98 (Beyond 2004 - Chaos! 200 million illegals waiting in the wings)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson