Donate Here By Secure Server
Posted on 04/05/2004 3:40:16 PM PDT by Libloather
Bush Says He Lacked Info on Sept. 11
46 minutes ago
By HOPE YEN, Associated Press Writer
WASHINGTON - President Bush said Monday he will tell the commission investigating the Sept. 11 attacks that his administration lacked the information needed to prevent the terrorists from striking.
The federal panel reviewing the attacks plans to meet soon with Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney in a joint private session to determine whether anything could have been done to stop the attacks.
A date for the meeting has been set but neither the commission nor the White House has disclosed it. Bush said he looks forward to "sharing information with them."
"Let me just be very clear about this," he said. "Had we had the information that was necessary to stop an attack, I'd have stopped the attack. ... If we'd have known that the enemy was going to fly airplanes into our buildings, we would have done everything in our power to stop it."
After the attacks, "this country immediately went on war footing and we went to war against al-Qaida. And we're going to keep after them until they are brought to justice and America is secure," Bush told reporters while on a trip to North Carolina.
Bush also said National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice "knows exactly what took place and will lay out the facts" when she testifies Thursday before the 10-member bipartisan panel. "I'm looking forward to people hearing her," he said.
Rice's testimony was assured only after Bush changed course last week under pressure and decided to allow her to appear publicly and under oath. She met privately with the commission in February.
The Bush administration had been uneasy that allowing a top aide to testify could set a precedent of summoning top aides before a congressional panel to provide sworn testimony. Such a move would inhibit the willingness of aides to provide the president with candid advice.
Commission spokesman Al Felzenberg said Monday the decision to let Rice testify might have been influenced by a 1945 photo the panel sent to the White House showing a top presidential aide appearing before a congressional panel to discuss policy advice.
The Nov. 22, 1945, New York Times photograph shows Adm. William D. Leahy, chief of staff to Presidents Franklin Roosevelt and Harry Truman, appearing before the special congressional panel investigating the Pearl Harbor attacks.
Felzenberg said the commission's executive director, Philip Zelikow, faxed the photo the day before the White House reversed its position, showing the administration there was historical support for allowing a top presidential aide to testify under oath before a congressional panel.
"It deals with the historical precedent which the White House and we were concerned about," Felzenberg said. "You won't find a clearer case."
Meanwhile, lawyers for the commission on Monday were checking thousands of classified counterterrorism documents from the Clinton administration to determine if Bush's aides had improperly withheld them.
The Bush administration granted the commission access to the documents Friday after Bruce Lindsey, who was legal adviser to President Clinton (news - web sites), said officials didn't turn over all of Clinton's records to the panel.
The commission expects to know by Tuesday whether additional documents should be released, or if the material is, as Bush aides have said, is largely duplicative or non-responsive to the commission's requests, Felzenberg said.
On the Net:
Sept. 11 commission: http://www.9-11commission.gov/
Guffaw!
That is probably the all time, most arrogant statement I've ever read here. Let me put it into some perspective, it took Albert Einstein - go ahead, compare Dr. Rice's IQ to his - and about 30 other leading scientists of the day to convince the Roosevelt administration to build the bomb. When the erudite, intelligent, articulate Soviet expert Rice takes the stand on Thursday she had better bring a healthy dose of humble with her. This entire administration, with the sole exception of the President, suffers from the worst case of hubris that I've ever seen. If I were him, I'd clean house after the election and start with a fresh crew.
Hubris, schmubris.
Janet Reno orders the Branch Davidian compound in Waco burned to the ground, does Fidel Castro's bidding and orders the kidnapping of an underage Cuban expatriate and obstructs the Whitewater investigation at every turn; Bill Clinton lies under oath, molests women in the White House, receives blowjobs from an intern while stuffing her vagina with cigars in the Oval Office and stares into a camera and lies to the American people about it; members of Congress' FBI files are found in Hillary Clinton's personal quarters and two Republican Speakers Of The House are slimed publicly as a result, and I haven't even scratched the surface, and you accuse the Bush administration of hubris? The Clintons believed they were untouchable and acted accordingly!
Talk about arrogance...your post reeks of it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.