To: SB00
Let's see if I have this right:
1. She is protesting US censorship of Janet Jackson which in fact did not happen.
2. Her protest of censorship of nudity is to pretend to be nude, but she does not have the actual guts to get nude. Was this because Canada would have censored her or she self censored?
This is a typcial brave modern liberal. This is sort of like protesting segregation in Orangeburg S.C. by staging a sit in at a lunch counter in Harlem?
65 posted on
04/05/2004 1:10:56 PM PDT by
JLS
To: JLS
She did a music video in which she was nude, and got some flak for it.
The video was heavily edited by the time it got to actual post production.
She isn't either gutsy enough to try that again, or foolish enough to think that people would listen to her for her body.
66 posted on
04/05/2004 1:13:02 PM PDT by
Darksheare
(Fortune for the day: "Mirrors are more fun than television" -Pink Flamingo from 'Address Unknown')
To: JLS
Her protest of censorship of nudity is to pretend to be nude, but she does not have the actual guts to get nude. Was this because Canada would have censored her or she self censored? She apparently had to remove the fake nipples and public hair from the suit because they couldn't be shown on Canadian tv. Wasn't she outraged by that censorship?
I would think such cartoonish looking nudity might actually be allowed here.
79 posted on
04/05/2004 2:28:53 PM PDT by
Dianna
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson