Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SB00
Let's see if I have this right:

1. She is protesting US censorship of Janet Jackson which in fact did not happen.

2. Her protest of censorship of nudity is to pretend to be nude, but she does not have the actual guts to get nude. Was this because Canada would have censored her or she self censored?

This is a typcial brave modern liberal. This is sort of like protesting segregation in Orangeburg S.C. by staging a sit in at a lunch counter in Harlem?
65 posted on 04/05/2004 1:10:56 PM PDT by JLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: JLS
She did a music video in which she was nude, and got some flak for it.
The video was heavily edited by the time it got to actual post production.
She isn't either gutsy enough to try that again, or foolish enough to think that people would listen to her for her body.
66 posted on 04/05/2004 1:13:02 PM PDT by Darksheare (Fortune for the day: "Mirrors are more fun than television" -Pink Flamingo from 'Address Unknown')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]

To: JLS
Her protest of censorship of nudity is to pretend to be nude, but she does not have the actual guts to get nude. Was this because Canada would have censored her or she self censored?

She apparently had to remove the fake nipples and public hair from the suit because they couldn't be shown on Canadian tv. Wasn't she outraged by that censorship?

I would think such cartoonish looking nudity might actually be allowed here.

79 posted on 04/05/2004 2:28:53 PM PDT by Dianna
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson