[Map Kernow]

"Unintentional hate still hurts," responded Caryl Stern, associate national director of the Anti-Defamation League. She called the Details piece "horribly offensive."

How the hell can HATE lack INTENT? And how can anyone with any pretense of breeding or civilization legitimately take offense where none is meant? Does this Foxman flunkie comprehend the English language?

Only a totalitarian fascist would try to divorce an offense from the actor's intent like this. What point will so-called "hate crimes" laws have if one can be found "guilty" of such a crime, even though the so-called "hate" is "unintentional"? It's an exercise worthy of George Orwell, and, not to my surprise at all, the anti-freedom, ethno-fascist, unAmerican ADL is leading the charge.

[uncitizen]

"Unintentional hate still hurts," responded Caryl Stern, associate national director of the Anti-Defamation League. She called the Details piece "horribly offensive."

How the hell can HATE lack INTENT?

You're not supposed to put that much thought into it. You know, like a liberal.

[expatpat]

For PC driven (drivel?) liberals, 'offensive' has been translated to 'hate', used as an adjective. TOf course, they're good at debasing words (eg., 'gay').