Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Future Snake Eater
In any case, if the faithful are wrong, that doesn't make it a "hoax", either. It could simply be a misconception. Even if it was an ancient cloth, it could have been something some1 found and *honestly* thought was an image of Christ, and in his enthusiasm deceived alot of people.

Just cuz something is not what it's made out to be, doesn't mean it was a deliberate "hoax".
71 posted on 04/05/2004 8:53:07 AM PDT by the OlLine Rebel (Common Sense is an Uncommon Virtue)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: the OlLine Rebel
It's not just about what someone thinks they see. In-depth analysis of the shroud has shown it to be very much the genuine article. It is a burial shroud of a man who was terribly scourged and then crucified. The cloth has been found to have definitely been in Jerusalem right around Golgotha, as well as France, as well as Turkey. The image was created by a 1/10th second burst of intense energy, and it's a nearly perfect x-ray image.
108 posted on 04/05/2004 9:34:10 AM PDT by Future Snake Eater ("Oh boy, I can't wait to eat that monkey!"--Abe Simpson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson