To: RS
Love these "explanations"... not a quarter second, not 2 seconds, but 1/10 ( without explaining what type of energy ) ... and I thought it was a negative image, not an x-rayOh, I'm sorry, you must be the PhD physicist who conducted the experiment that determined the length of time it took. And you probably also already know that energy doesn't just "appear" from people, so no one really has any idea the type/source of energy. You also probably "know" that the "negative image" idea was totally debunked when they showed the images of the Shroud to various doctors and experienced criminologists who very quickly identified it as an x-ray image.
Don't bring your snide crap to me until you've done some research.
277 posted on
04/05/2004 7:41:20 PM PDT by
Future Snake Eater
("Oh boy, I can't wait to eat that monkey!"--Abe Simpson)
To: Future Snake Eater
"Oh, I'm sorry, you must be the PhD physicist who conducted the experiment that determined the length of time it took. "
"Don't bring your snide crap to me until you've done some research."
Hmm... I thought the problem was that we were NOT able to duplicate the creation of the image - I suppose I was mistaken and you know better then all the others here that say it is a mystery how the image was created ....
</snide crap>
290 posted on
04/05/2004 10:05:41 PM PDT by
RS
(Just because they're out to get him doesn't mean he's not guilty)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson