Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: the OlLine Rebel
the OlLine Rebel wrote:

Besides the fact that DNA from 100 years apart of indirect relatives is a shot in the dark (to wit: that Jefferson nonsense), Jesus was not actually the biological son of Joseph (and hence David). He may only have been the bio son of Mary, whose lineage is, of course being a woman, ignored. In any case, being the actual Son of God, it's possible there is no real DNA to go on, anyway.





I thought Jewish people of that period traced lineage through the mother's side?
230 posted on 04/05/2004 1:14:11 PM PDT by tiamat ("Just a Bronze-Age Gal, Trapped in a Techno World!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]


To: tiamat
I thought Jewish people of that period traced lineage through the mother's side?

YEs, because before DNA testing you couldn't prove who your daddy was.
245 posted on 04/05/2004 1:50:54 PM PDT by johnb838 (Kerry: Wrong on Defense, Wrong on Taxes. Too Liberal for America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 230 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson