Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: archy
Maybe the second stage deployed with a smaller, more compact launch vehicle?

How do you get it going fast enough without the booster?

You'd still need an rather large vessel to carry the launcher, target acquisition radars, and guidance radars, along with their power supplies.

75 posted on 04/06/2004 5:28:48 AM PDT by Poohbah ("Would you mind not shooting at the thermonuclear weapons?" -- Maj. Vic Deakins, USAF)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]


To: Poohbah
Maybe the second stage deployed with a smaller, more compact launch vehicle?

How do you get it going fast enough without the booster?

I'm thinking somewhat less of a booster than standard. I'm no aerospace engineer, but I guess if Saddam's old Scuds could be hotrodded, so could a more modern solid-fuel unit.

You'd still need an rather large vessel to carry the launcher, target acquisition radars, and guidance radars, along with their power supplies.

It'd need to be both a large enough vehicle to low-profile and yet carry a 7 meter/21 foot-long missile in its shipping container and with enough deck spece to erect and fire it; not impossible given a 30-footer or so, but a bit more than could be managed from a ski boat or Boston Whaler. A smallish houseboat might be a possibility, though.

And it might be possible to eliminate much of the supporting electronics if the guidance system were reworked to home in on an airliner's transponder instead.

76 posted on 04/06/2004 5:55:15 AM PDT by archy (The darkness will come. It will find you,and it will scare you like you've never been scared before.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson