Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dan from Michigan
I've never fired a TEC-9 but for all its hype, I've heard it was actually a low quality gun that just has large magazines.

There are some people who believe, rightly or wrongly, that the nastier a firearm looks, the more likely it will be to make an attacker realize the error of his ways before he has to be shot. I expect that this is true, up to a certain point. Someone who confronts a home invader with a North American Arms .22LR mini revolver will likely not get the same reaction as someone who confronts the invader with a Mossberg 500. But I don't know that the ugliness of the Tec-9 would increase its deterrent value over, say, the nice sleek lines of a Luger.

49 posted on 04/03/2004 1:46:49 PM PST by supercat (Why is it that the more "gun safety" laws are passed, the less safe my guns seem?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]


To: supercat
But I don't know that the ugliness of the Tec-9 would increase its deterrent value over, say, the nice sleek lines of a Luger.

A .45 1911 isn't bad looking and has more deterrent value than either

56 posted on 04/03/2004 6:09:51 PM PST by SauronOfMordor (That which does not kill me had better be able to run away damn fast.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson