>>The statement didn't much impress Liddy, who said he stands by his original comments.
Now, let's not distract "G" with any stinkin' facts....he don't need no stinkin' facts...
Well, let's see the facts. I'm open to them, but that Westwood statement carried only unsupported assertions. I hope O'Reilly does well, so don't have a dog in the hunt. And he's darned sure doing better that Liddy, I'm sure, with number of listeners (I'm equally sure not as well with content).
But your statement presupposes there are "facts" that refute Liddy. Let's see 'em.