[Excuse_My_Bellicosity]

Read #8. And, what do you have against wilderness access? How can you justify locking citizens off "public" lands? Forget about development, you can't even be there. I thought it belonged to everybody. It only belongs to people like Robert Redford.

[stuartcr]

That doesn't seem like a good reason for not wanting to preserve the wilderness. As bad as it is, I would think that a few rich people would be better for wilderness preservation, than a whole bunch of people with RVs, logging trucks, and off-road vehicles. Since I'm not rich, I may not be able to use this property, but at least the critters that live there would be better off.