Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 04/01/2004 5:31:11 PM PST by swilhelm73
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: swilhelm73; BADJOE; GeneralHavoc
Good write-up; ping.
2 posted on 04/01/2004 6:28:24 PM PST by brityank (The more I learn about the Constitution, the more I realise this Government is UNconstitutional.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All

Always Breaking News
on Free Republic!

Bring it on!

Take it back!

Donate Here By Secure Server

Or mail checks to:        
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794

Or you can use:                     
PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com

STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD-
It is in the breaking news sidebar!


3 posted on 04/01/2004 6:29:16 PM PST by Support Free Republic (I'd rather be sleeping. Let's get this over with so I can go back to sleep!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: swilhelm73
Nice article. In an ideal world, all three would be elected in the fall and smack some sense into the Senate leadership. Unfortunately, I also agree with the article in that I think Coburn is probably the only one that will be nominated and elected. Toomey has made quite a dent against Specter, but he has a ways to go to make up the rest of the difference. As many on here have said, just about anybody can pull 35-40% against Specter in a primary, but it remains to be seen whether he can get to 50%. It is also a tossup at best that Toomey wins the general election if nominated. I know very little about Schaffer, but he is going to need to make up alot of ground in fundraising, organization, etc. if he wants to beat Salazar. He's been out of the public eye for a few years and he has never won statewide before. I'd consider him the underdog at this point, which is stinks because Campbell would have breezed to victory and now we might lose the seat.
4 posted on 04/01/2004 6:40:01 PM PST by zebrahead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: swilhelm73
I hope Tummey wins, but I disagree with the analysis on why Bush is supporting Spectre.

Bush has always made perfectly clear what his position is on abortion. He has never wavered, retreated or deviated from his initial position, even though most prolife people never understood what he was saying.

One last time: Bush has always said that the abortion laws will not be changed until the hearts of the American people are changed. Why are prochoice people unable to understand that simple statement?

Bush made it his highest priority to change minds. His first major piece of legislation was the embryo stem cell law. He created a two-month long national, debate on the morality of killing human embryos. His first prime-time address to the nation was to argue that embryos are real living human beings.

In less than four years Bush has completely reversed to hearts of the American people. Polls now show that 75% oppose abortion except in extreme situations.Have they already forgotten partial birth abortion?

Neither Spectre nor any judge will make any difference once the hearts are changed.

5 posted on 04/01/2004 6:48:04 PM PST by bayourod (We can depend on Scary Kerry's imaginary foreign leaders to protect us from terrorists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: swilhelm73

6 posted on 04/01/2004 9:49:01 PM PST by GeneralHavoc (Want to Help Pat Toomey? Join Toomey Meetup!: http://www.toomeyforsenate.meetup.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson