Replies

Here this isn't "cut and paste":

Romans 1:20 For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse:
21 Because that, when they knew God, they glorified him not as God, neither were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened.
22 Professing themselves to be wise; they became as fools.

Genesis 1 In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.

Dr. Kent Hovind, Dr. Carl Baugh and other scientists that I have read offer more than enough evidence that evolution
is not true. You can choose to not believe what they say, but why are evolutionists using lies to make their case? I am not confined to drdino.com, but I'm not ashamed to use his material which is offered without a copyright. As for evidence, apparently the evolution theory you know about is so complicated you are unable to explain it.

I found a lovely article addressing the bogus and intellectually bankrupt claim that Archaeopteryx was a fraud.

I don't know why you bother to recite Scripture. Christians who accept evolution are clearly not going to be swayed by what they've heard before, and as a non-Christian I'm not going to be swayed by it either (and, by the way, I've seen it before). It's just words from someone else's book of mythology.

Dr. Kent Hovind, Dr. Carl Baugh and other scientists that I have read offer more than enough evidence that evolution is not true.

And yet you've shown absolutely no understanding of the concepts. When Hovid's documented lies are presented to you, you ignore them and hope that they will go away.

You can choose to not believe what they say, but why are evolutionists using lies to make their case?

Why do you claim that they are lies? You don't have the intellect to understand the claims in the first place, so you have no business calling them lies. As for Hovind, he's a documented liar. I even pointed out that he was outright wrong about the claims that evolution says anything about the origins of the universe or the origins of life. If he's so ignorant (or dishonest) as to make such claims, how can he be trusted on anything else.

As for evidence, apparently the evolution theory you know about is so complicated you are unable to explain it.

In psychological terms, this is called "projection". Your utter ignorance of the theory of evolution does not debunk it.