[NC28203]

After reviewing Cowgirl's post again, I will concede your point. I was incorrect to cite the Iroquois creation story since Cowgirl does not specifically call for the teaching of Creationism (though I would wager that is what she would like to have done). But based on her words in the post and without further indication I will assume that she would prefer no version of creation be taught.
I would counter that since we are supposed to be teaching science, we at least go for the theory that has testable hypotheses> Lets leave creation stories out of the picture as there is as much scientific evidence of this continent being formed from the back of a turtle as there is that the Earth was formed in six days about 6,000 years ago.

[Cowgirl]

I am only for teaching science that does not include lies, of which the text books are full. They must lie in order to have something to prove evolution. I have no problem with showing truth that is known, not theory that is ridiculous. A bird can adapt to a climate or be bred to look quite different than what it started out to be, but it will still be a bird. If there were no dinosaurs ever present a few thousand years ago, why do
caves have pictures of dinosaurs drawn by american Indians before the white man ever showed up. There are many such
evidences of man living with dinosaurs, but they were called dragons. The word dinosaur did not exist then. Why does written history take us back to a maximum of 10,000 years but the only evidence for prehistoric times
is a few fossils supposedly dated by the layers. The
earth is winding down, it is not evolving. You have not
studied creationism if you think there is no evidence for
a different theory than the lying evolutionists.