Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 04/01/2004 11:17:07 AM PST by Heartlander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Heartlander
But, of course, darwinism/secularism/materialism/socialism is not a religion, it is a philosophical worldview consistent with the scientific method; hence not covered by the First Amendment's Establishment clause. That only applies to grubby fundamentalist Christians. [/sarcasm off]
2 posted on 04/01/2004 11:22:44 AM PST by old3030 ("Appearances are a glimpse of what is hidden." (Anaxagoras))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Heartlander
What gives? The creationists finally got what they wanted - religion in the schools. Welcome to the brave new world that you were supposed to be in favor of - enjoy the ride, and please keep your hands and feet inside the car at all times.
3 posted on 04/01/2004 11:27:33 AM PST by general_re (The doors to Heaven and Hell are adjacent and identical... - Nikos Kazantzakis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Heartlander
Just wondering what the faith-based criticisms of evolutionary theory cited in the first paragraph are. Are they separate from science-based criticisms?
4 posted on 04/01/2004 11:27:53 AM PST by NC28203
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Heartlander
— John West is a senior fellow at the Discovery Institute and an Associate Professor of Political Science at Seattle Pacific University.

Once again, a member of the Discovery Institute is reduced to making political attacks on evolution instead of attacking the science. Someday, I hope to see a DI representative with some sort of scientific pronouncement of a research program related to ID. It's been 4 years, though, and nary a scientific pronouncement has been found. Why don't they just admit that they are not interested in furthering science, but instead their perverted Wedge Strategy?

13 posted on 04/01/2004 12:02:46 PM PST by ThinkPlease (Fortune Favors the Bold!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Heartlander
But the strangest part of the website, by far, is the section that encourages educators to use religion to endorse evolution.

This is one big reason why I'm an evo-skeptic. The proponents seem to use techniques more akin to marketing or propaganda than detached science.

What would be the big crisis in the advancement of knowledge if the idea was doubted that every living thing descended from the same cell via undirected events?

22 posted on 04/01/2004 1:22:13 PM PST by Tribune7 (Arlen Specter supports the International Crime Court having jurisdiction over US soldiers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Heartlander
Disappointing that National Review can't see through the Discovery Institute, which will never discover anything except that the latest real discovery needs a rebuttal.
30 posted on 04/01/2004 1:51:10 PM PST by VadeRetro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Heartlander
But the strangest part of the website, by far, is the section that encourages educators to use religion to endorse evolution.

I agree with the Discovery Institute on this one issue. Science courses should not mention religion, period. Going through a list of religions which endorse evolution is getting too close to an establishment of religion for my taste.

51 posted on 04/02/2004 8:38:57 AM PST by Right Wing Professor (300,000 new jobs in March. Poor John Kerry.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson