[adam_az]

1) They called it "The Pentagon's Papers" to try to bring to mind "The Pentagon Papers" and Richard Nixon but anyone with an IQ room temp. or higher will understand there is no connection. They are trying to infer that George Bush is Richard Nixon, which is a preposterous idea.

2) Whomever found them was a moron for turning them over to CAP instead of returning them to the Pentagon.

3) There is nothing exceptional about the papers. There is nothing that isn't already publicly known. The information in the papers is 100% consistent with what the Bush administration has said publicly. There is no secret strategy, no dirty tricks campaign. If they think they have a big scoop, they are wrong. Referring to their contents as "spin" is it's self spin and completely disingenuous. As if you's expected differently from a Glueboy Soros organization...

5) They added their own notes and comments to the PDF file in a way that makes them seem like part of the document. This is even more disingenuous. If anything, they should have left their comments as part of a separate document.

[piasa]

They called it "The Pentagon's Papers" to try to bring to mind "The Pentagon Papers"

Bingo. For a bunch of folks who were previously in the White House, they sure have been coming up with the lamest stuff and lamest malcontented 'whistleblowers' ; I keep expecting them to put a flaming shopping bag full of Daschle-crap on the White House porch in the hopes that they can get Bush to step in it to put it out while they are giggling over their wit down at the playground.