[Lord_Baltar]

So, let me see if I understand the rationale here.

Anyone who "attacks" (or in some cases, simply voices disagreement with a sitting President) is to be considered "Anti-American" and worthy of being placed on some sort of Black List?

Here's a hypothetical question for you. Let's say (horror of horrors) Kerry beats Bush come November, would that make any here who would most likely be in the "attack choir" be by default "Anti-American" as well?

To be honest Jack, I've always been opposed to this concept of "Black Lists"

[El Gran Salseron]

"Anyone who "attacks" (or in some cases, simply voices disagreement with a sitting President) is to be considered "Anti-American" and worthy of being placed on some sort of Black List? "

During war time?

YES, absolutely!