Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jeff Gordon
Contrary to the point of the article, we DO want to engourage larger families for those families that can afford to be larger.

Using taxation-and-redistribution to produce behavior that wouldn't otherwise be engaged in by free citizens isn't something THIS conservative/libertarian wants to encourage. My local school district now spends $20,000 per year per student in its socialist indoctrination centers, where nearly all many-child families send their children. This is being paid for with tax revenues confiscated largely from families with few children, who are struggling to pay for private school, or to keep mom out of the workforce to homeschool, and from young professionals who are putting off having any children due the high cost of private school combined with heavy tax bite. Let's not pretend that these large families with kids in public schools "can afford" all these kids -- the only way they "afford" it is by taking other families' money.

24 posted on 03/30/2004 5:53:00 PM PST by GovernmentShrinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: GovernmentShrinker
Children are cheaper in bulk.

The cost per kid goes down. That goes for school districts, families, states....

It's the only child who has to have one of each of everything who really trashes the environment....

Hand-me-downs rule. If you plan well, have sons first--girls can wear their big brother's clothes. :-) And you'll have the bonus backup on hand when she starts dating, too!
25 posted on 03/30/2004 6:00:34 PM PST by Triple Word Score (Meretriciousness Everywhere.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson