Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: nightdriver
Any reputable History of Economics will show that a situation like that will elevate the living standard of the producer and lower the living standard of the consumer.

How does leaving consumers with more money to spend (because they've saved by paying lower prices) lower their standard of living? Thanks.

112 posted on 03/31/2004 9:21:56 AM PST by Mike Bates (Artist Formerly Known as mikeb704.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies ]


To: Mike Bates
"How does leaving consumers with more money to spend (because they've saved by paying lower prices) lower their standard of living?"

Because, in the macro view, they have given up their means of earning money to those who produce. They can only spend for a short time without earning more, and they can't earn if their jobs have gone to a foreign country.

It makes little difference how cheap goods are if you don't have any money left to buy them.

Case in point:

The Spanish came back to Spain with a lot of gold from the new world. They used it to buy all sorts of goods manufactured in Italy and other countries who gained the expertise of production.

The end result was that Spain consumed like mad for a while but ended up being very poor after their gold ran out. The producers not only had their gold, but they had the means of production so that they could generate more wealth.

This is the direction America is in danger of heading with respect to India, China, etc.

116 posted on 03/31/2004 10:59:51 AM PST by nightdriver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson