Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Another example of government "protection."
1 posted on 03/30/2004 10:56:07 AM PST by Mike Bates
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Mike Bates
Public Enemy #1 = Labor Unions
2 posted on 03/30/2004 10:59:00 AM PST by EggsAckley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mike Bates
God save us from low prices.
3 posted on 03/30/2004 11:00:15 AM PST by Agnes Heep (Solus cum sola non cogitabuntur orare pater noster)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mike Bates
When the Chicago city government is comprised of crooks and frauds, I'd hate to think crooks are "protecing" me, if I was living in Chicago.
4 posted on 03/30/2004 11:08:29 AM PST by BigSkyFreeper (Liberalism is Communism one drink at a time. - P.J. O'Rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mike Bates
One of the reasons that WalMart is a target of Leftist Legislators:

     
The Basics
Big Picture
Who Gives
Who Gets
News
Get Local!

HOME  |  DONATE  |  SEARCH   

2004 Election Overview   |   Industries   |   Top All-time Donors   |   Donor Lookup   |   PACs   |   Soft Money   |   Lobbyists
   

FORMAT TO PRINT
E-MAIL TO A FRIEND

opensecrets.org
Center logo
THE CENTER
FOR RESPONSIVE
POLITICS

2004 ELECTION OVERVIEW
Top Overall Donors

Breakdown to display:

Rank

Contributor

Total Contributions

To Dems

To Repubs

Contributions Tilt

1

Goldman Sachs

$2,656,413

51%

49%

On the fence

2

National Assn of Realtors

$1,464,806

51%

49%

On the fence

3

Wal-Mart Stores

$1,372,840

16%

84%

Strongly Republican

4

Lehman Brothers

$1,272,063

45%

55%

On the fence

5

Citigroup Inc

$1,262,072

46%

54%

On the fence

6

Time Warner

$1,100,781

71%

29%

Strongly Democratic

7

SBC Communications

$1,093,935

32%

68%

Strongly Republican

8

Assn of Trial Lawyers of America

$1,047,499

91%

9%

Solidly Democratic

9

Morgan Stanley

$1,039,883

37%

63%

Leans Republican

10

National Assn of Home Builders

$1,034,500

38%

61%

Leans Republican

11

United Parcel Service

$1,024,271

28%

72%

Strongly Republican

12

Merrill Lynch

$1,016,789

20%

80%

Strongly Republican

13

Laborers Union

$997,880

82%

18%

Strongly Democratic

14

Intl Brotherhood of Electrical Workers

$979,330

96%

4%

Solidly Democratic

15

Carpenters & Joiners Union

$970,000

63%

37%

Leans Democratic

16

Machinists/Aerospace Workers Union

$942,011

98%

1%

Solidly Democratic

17

National Auto Dealers Assn

$936,300

30%

70%

Strongly Republican

18

PriceWaterhouseCoopers

$925,108

14%

86%

Strongly Republican

19

Microsoft Corp

$914,882

56%

44%

Leans Democratic

20

UBS Americas

$912,738

28%

71%

Strongly Republican

21

National Beer Wholesalers Assn

$888,618

26%

74%

Strongly Republican

22

MBNA Corp

$875,647

23%

77%

Strongly Republican

23

Credit Union National Assn

$873,063

41%

59%

Leans Republican

24

Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu

$841,135

25%

75%

Strongly Republican

25

Ernst & Young

$806,077

29%

71%

Strongly Republican

26

Blue Cross/Blue Shield

$805,032

37%

63%

Leans Republican

27

Teamsters Union

$801,500

85%

14%

Strongly Democratic

28

American Fedn of St/Cnty/Munic Employees

$797,089

97%

2%

Solidly Democratic

29

General Electric

$794,690

40%

60%

Leans Republican

30

Verizon Communications

$794,339

34%

66%

Leans Republican

31

Service Employees International Union

$779,800

83%

17%

Strongly Democratic

32

JP Morgan Chase & Co

$778,281

50%

51%

On the fence

33

American Bankers Assn

$768,918

39%

61%

Leans Republican

34

Lockheed Martin

$768,589

39%

61%

Leans Republican

35

Credit Suisse First Boston

$739,500

36%

64%

Leans Republican

36

Air Line Pilots Assn

$718,250

78%

22%

Strongly Democratic

37

United Auto Workers

$715,930

99%

1%

Solidly Democratic

38

KPMG LLP

$713,585

23%

77%

Strongly Republican

39

Northrop Grumman

$702,522

37%

63%

Leans Republican

40

EMILY's List

$700,324

100%

0%

Solidly Democratic

41

General Dynamics

$667,825

38%

62%

Leans Republican

42

American Hospital Assn

$666,752

41%

59%

Leans Republican

43

American Postal Workers Union

$659,500

77%

22%

Strongly Democratic

44

Bear Stearns

$656,083

39%

61%

Leans Republican

45

BellSouth Corp

$650,560

40%

60%

Leans Republican

46

Operating Engineers Union

$645,619

75%

25%

Strongly Democratic

47

AFLAC Inc

$639,142

37%

63%

Leans Republican

48

Boeing Co

$638,976

40%

60%

Leans Republican

49

Blank Rome LLP

$636,350

23%

77%

Strongly Republican

50

Piper Rudnick LLP

$630,597

68%

31%

Strongly Democratic

51

Greenberg, Traurig et al

$617,754

61%

39%

Leans Democratic

52

Sheet Metal Workers Union

$607,100

96%

4%

Solidly Democratic

53

Union Pacific Corp

$605,548

18%

82%

Strongly Republican

54

American Dental Assn

$597,258

40%

60%

Leans Republican

55

American Maritime Officers

$589,500

43%

57%

Leans Republican

56

Associated Builders & Contractors

$587,800

1%

99%

Solidly Republican

57

Pfizer Inc

$581,729

35%

65%

Leans Republican

58

United Transportation Union

$573,650

82%

18%

Strongly Democratic

59

Southern Co

$568,900

19%

81%

Strongly Republican

60

Wachovia Corp

$565,960

33%

67%

Strongly Republican

61

Bank of America

$559,440

45%

55%

On the fence

62

Viacom Inc

$557,300

72%

28%

Strongly Democratic

63

Akin, Gump et al

$550,278

55%

45%

On the fence

64

Boilermakers Union

$546,200

94%

5%

Solidly Democratic

65

National Air Traffic Controllers Assn

$545,750

61%

39%

Leans Democratic

66

Ironworkers Union

$537,225

85%

14%

Strongly Democratic

67

National Rural Electric Cooperative Assn

$529,673

43%

57%

Leans Republican

68

Skadden, Arps et al

$488,119

74%

25%

Strongly Democratic

69

International Assn of Fire Fighters

$476,600

74%

26%

Strongly Democratic

70

Cassidy & Assoc/Interpublic Group

$474,867

48%

52%

On the fence

71

Federal Express Corp

$457,700

29%

71%

Strongly Republican

72

Baron & Budd

$450,183

96%

4%

Solidly Democratic

73

Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance

$446,300

44%

56%

On the fence

74

American International Group

$438,663

38%

62%

Leans Republican

75

United Food & Commercial Workers Union

$436,550

99%

2%

Solidly Democratic

76

Bank One Corp

$434,336

46%

54%

On the fence

77

Wells Fargo

$429,116

41%

59%

Leans Republican

78

Comcast Corp

$426,373

41%

59%

Leans Republican

79

Patton Boggs LLP

$419,583

70%

29%

Strongly Democratic

80

Natl Assn Insurance & Financial Advisors

$416,700

33%

67%

Strongly Republican

81

Metropolitan Life

$414,711

57%

43%

Leans Democratic

82

GlaxoSmithKline

$409,500

31%

69%

Strongly Republican

83

Americans for a Republican Majority

$409,278

0%

99%

Solidly Republican

84

Altria Group

$405,550

41%

59%

Leans Republican

85

United Technologies

$403,465

37%

63%

Leans Republican

86

National Rifle Assn

$402,123

14%

86%

Strongly Republican

87

WPP Group

$401,648

45%

54%

On the fence

88

Communications Workers of America

$397,708

99%

1%

Solidly Democratic

89

Simmons Firm

$391,750

100%

0%

Solidly Democratic

90

Walt Disney Co

$381,210

62%

38%

Leans Democratic

91

Holland & Knight

$377,537

57%

43%

Leans Democratic

92

International Longshoremens Assn

$377,400

93%

7%

Solidly Democratic

93

American Financial Group

$369,849

4%

96%

Solidly Republican

94

AFL-CIO

$367,400

87%

13%

Strongly Democratic

95

Exelon Corp

$365,418

43%

57%

Leans Republican

96

Cigna Corp

$362,294

17%

83%

Strongly Republican

97

HSBC USA

$360,500

39%

61%

Leans Republican

98

Eli Lilly & Co

$359,927

29%

71%

Strongly Republican

99

Amalgamated Transit Union

$359,750

85%

15%

Strongly Democratic

100

Winston & Strawn

$353,404

30%

69%

Strongly Republican

METHODOLOGY: The numbers on this page are based on contributions from PACs and individuals giving $200 or more to federal candidates and parties as reported to the Federal Election Commission.

All the numbers on this page are for the 2004 election cycle and are based on data released by the FEC on Monday, March 01, 2004. Feel free to distribute or cite this material, but please credit the Center for Responsive Politics.

To view data for previous cycles, visit our Big Picture section.


5 posted on 03/30/2004 11:11:10 AM PST by So Cal Rocket (If consistency is the hobgoblin of small minds, John F. Kerry’s mind must be freaking enormous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mike Bates
I actually do not like Wal-Mart because they DO run other grocery stores out of business, which lowers the amount of merchandise I have to choose from. In my town Lowes is a gonner, ALbertsons is next, and I hate to count the
wonderful "Mom & Pops" they have destroyed.

Would not be so bad but Wal-Mart has a HORRIBLE selection of food-colored,water filled meats, no real brand-name selection in canned and dry goods . .etc. If Wal-Mart had a better selection, I suppose it would be OK to run old mom and pop stores out of business, but they really stink in the food selection areas.
6 posted on 03/30/2004 11:11:24 AM PST by Iron Matron (Civil Disobedience? It's not just for liberals anymore!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mike Bates
This article makes some good points, but it does not present a fair portrayal of the opposing position. It reads like it was written by a libertarian, and it makes generous use of sophistry. It would be a much better article if the author actually dealt with (and refuted) the best objections to his position, instead of ridiculous speculation that the reason a number of communities oppose Wal-Marts is that, for example, Wal-Mart sells Bibles.
7 posted on 03/30/2004 11:16:41 AM PST by adiaireton8 ("There is no greater evil one can suffer than to hate reasonable discourse." - Plato, Phaedo 89d)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mike Bates
bump for later
8 posted on 03/30/2004 11:18:25 AM PST by Richard Kimball
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mike Bates
Why the war against Wal-Mart?

Cuz Wal-Mart sucks.

Go Target! (pronounced, Tarz-shay)

17 posted on 03/30/2004 11:39:17 AM PST by PokeyJoe (FreeBSD; The devil made me do it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mike Bates
Do you think this lengthy list of political contributions by the Walton family has anything to do with it?
21 posted on 03/30/2004 11:55:24 AM PST by newsmeat.com
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mike Bates
Ironic that the headquarters for Sears and Montgomery Wards are located in Chicago. They were the Wal-Marts of their time.
25 posted on 03/30/2004 12:12:00 PM PST by Cooter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mike Bates
Sure, the politicians hate Wal-Mart because their union boss masters tell them to!! But, there are other reasons. It is hard to extort Wal-Marts. The politicians and community leaders can't put friends and relatives on their payroll in phantom jobs and can't demand cash payments for certain public services. No expediting fee for processing permits. And, the bros in the neighborhood can't help themselves to whatever they want knowing that the merchant won't stand up against the politician.

We have a cluster of new Wal-Marts and they are great!! I don't have to wait around 'til the Albertson's deli guy has nothing better to do than wait on me. The Albertson's vendors believe they own the aisles and floor space during the day and don't have to worry about customers. The last ma & pa store in this area (good selection and good customer support on the floor) still has ma handling the cash at the only checkout register. She, no matter how many people are on line, also answers the 'phone. Why shouldn't a well run Wal-Mart with good prices and selection drive a poorly run, high-priced place out of business?

28 posted on 03/30/2004 12:15:33 PM PST by Tacis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mike Bates
Maybe the irritation is the senior citizens hired to be greeters.

But they're very clean senior citizen greeters.

36 posted on 03/30/2004 12:22:20 PM PST by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mike Bates
When Walmart came to our small town, every employee worth their salt got a job there and likely added $3 an hour to their wages.

The fact is, that Mom and Pop didn't pay their employees well and sometimes didn't treat them well.

For smaller towns everywhere, Walmart basically becomes the standard for employment. If you can control what Walmart does, you can indirectly control policy and wages at many more small companies and retail stores across the country.
42 posted on 03/30/2004 12:30:47 PM PST by Peter J. Huss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mike Bates
"Again, there seems to be some snobbery at work in all the Wal-Mart loathing. Is it because the stores provide decent goods at affordable prices to the great unwashed, thereby improving their living standards even to the point of having some of the same conveniences as their betters? "

YES, that plus the whole unbridled capitalism thing. And, elites despise it because it's where us proles go to shop. Make no mistake, the so-called "elites" THOROUGHLY despise the middle class.

63 posted on 03/30/2004 2:01:22 PM PST by walden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mike Bates
I have some old Congressional Records from 1935. Congress was talking about the evils of the chain stores, Sears Roebuck and Montgomery Wards and what could be done to save society. They talked about legislation that would make it easier for businesses to band together and buy in bulk.

This morning, I was reading a section where they were debating the amount of money spent on defense with the usual arguments. Reading that, and knowing what was on the horizon for them, is sobering, more so when one realizes that the same kind of debates that were happening in May-June of 1935 are happening today--defense spending, tarifs, or the lack thereof, unions, chain stores.

70 posted on 03/30/2004 4:36:43 PM PST by WhiteyAppleseed (2 million defensive gun uses a year. Tell that to the Gun Fairy who'd rather leave you toothless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mike Bates
I think this is a pretty good reason to stay away from Wal-Mart (even if this article is from CNN):

http://www.cnn.com/2004/LAW/02/03/walmart.lawsuit.ap/
71 posted on 03/30/2004 4:37:07 PM PST by Piranha
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mike Bates
There may even be a union member or two who wouldn’t mind saving a few bucks.

A union local in Houston had a new building constructed - with non-union labor - because otherwise they couldn't afford it.

91 posted on 03/31/2004 6:23:04 AM PST by Flyer ( http://talesfromtherail.com/ . . . .The disaster in Houston known as MetroRail)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mike Bates
John Kerry’s wife, Teresa Heinz Kerry, said a few weeks ago that Wal-Marts "drive me crazy" because "they destroy communities."

Even a stopped clock is right twice a day.

PeoplesLiberationArmyMART is going to have to give me a better reason to like them than the fact that Teresa Heinz Kerry does not.

But if Teresa really wanted to put her money where her mouth was, she could pull her products from WalMART's shelves.

100 posted on 03/31/2004 6:47:56 AM PST by bondjamesbond (Stay well - Stay safe - Stay armed - Yorktown)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mike Bates
"Opening a Wal-Mart means jobs and plenty of them."

No, Mr. Bates, that is a near-sighted view of the issue.

Wal-Mart is in the vortex between the living standard of the U.S. and the living standards of the countries where Wal-Mart's goods are produced.

Any reputable History of Economics will show that a situation like that will elevate the living standard of the producer and lower the living standard of the consumer.

103 posted on 03/31/2004 7:05:02 AM PST by nightdriver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson