To: *Catholic_list; sartorius
Bump for those interested in SCOTUS decisions regarding abortion and homosexuality.
2 posted on
03/30/2004 8:11:35 AM PST by
Aquinasfan
(Isaiah 22:22, Rev 3:7, Mat 16:19)
To: Aquinasfan
Impeach first.
Try for sedition next.
3 posted on
03/30/2004 8:19:59 AM PST by
thoughtomator
(Voting Bush because there is no reasonable alternative)
To: Aquinasfan
Teenage boy: "That's right, Mr. Bruen, it's true that subatomic particles whizzing around each other give the illusion that you and I exist, and that we exist in the material world. But it is only an illusion. The only reality is in the realm of the spirit.
"So since we do not really possess bodies, and they are a mere construct of our reasoning process, what we do in these putative bodies is of no consequence in the intellectual and spiritual realm, which is the only true form of existence.
Somehow, I've missed all these NeoPlatonist kids. Most of them seem just to want to drink beer and watch TV.
To: Aquinasfan
"Uhhh, could you repeat that, Mr Bruen?"
To: Aquinasfan
Most impressive. Never before have I seen a man gaze a hole right through his navel.
8 posted on
03/30/2004 9:09:16 AM PST by
gcruse
(http://gcruse.typepad.com/)
To: Aquinasfan
So, if your visitor starts babbling about defining his own concept of existence, you might be justified in concluding he hoped to sodomize your son. so...first he's gonna bone my daughter, then he's gonna bone my sone????
Whiskey Tango Foxtrot, over...
Idiot.
To: Aquinasfan; yall
Bruen writes:
There is no Constitutional right to abort a child or to sodomize your neighbor.
The USSC has never said there were such absolute rights. Both abortion & sodomy can be & are regulated by our States, within the constitutional guidelines of our BOR's..
The Supreme Court has created a perception otherwise, but it was unprincipled in doing so, and we would be justified in tossing it out on its ear. James G. Bruen, Jr. is an attorney.
Bruen is an unprincipled attorney, imo, seeing that he should know that our constitutional principles have not been violated by the court in either case he cites.
-- His hyperbole is irresponsible, and he is close to violating his own oath to protect & defend the US Constitution.
24 posted on
03/30/2004 7:26:13 PM PST by
tpaine
(In arrogance a few powermad infinitely shrewd imbeciles attempt to lay down the law for all of us)
To: Aquinasfan
"Creating a Parallel Universe" that's the episode where Spock has a beard...
46 posted on
03/31/2004 7:53:26 AM PST by
isom35
To: Aquinasfan
Several decades ago, I took Con Law and struggled with the left-leaning prof teaching the class. On the final exam, the last question was "How has this class changed your life?"
I answered, "It has made me realize the law you teach was not for me."
I got a 'B' yet left law school having discovered there was not much justice in lawyers' law.
78 posted on
04/01/2004 10:10:51 AM PST by
sonofatpatcher2
(Love & a .45-- What more could you want, campers? };^)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson