To: BJungNan
The thing is, she has ALREADY testified before Congress and the 911 Committee, for four solid hours. But it was secret, classified testimony, not in a forum where she could be ridiculed and chastised like an errant child in full view of millions of Americans. Not only is this cartoon childish and snide, it's an out and out LIE. (Gosh, I really hate liberals.)
6 posted on
03/30/2004 6:07:37 AM PST by
shezza
To: shezza
Rush said something really interesting yesterday on his show....he made a brief brush statement that the reason these liberals are so heated up on Condi Rice and one of the reasons why Hildabest has been quiet lately is to possibly knock Condi Rice out of the Presidential race in 2008.....something to think about....
10 posted on
03/30/2004 6:10:00 AM PST by
smiley
To: shezza
Remember how during the Lewinsky case the Dems insisted that Kenneth Starr appear before Congress, and when he reluctantly agreed, they said it was unethical for him to testify? I wonder if they will try to pull a similar bait-and-switch with Rice, e.g., if she appears and wipes the floor with Clark and Ben Veniste, will they then say that she shouldn't have appeared, that she jeopardized national security and cost American lives, just to save her own ego? Or some such thing . . . never underestimate the ability of the Dems to turn things completely upside down, from one minute to the next.
41 posted on
03/30/2004 7:39:05 AM PST by
Steve_Seattle
("Above all, shake your bum at Burton.")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson