Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dutchgirl
A breath of fresh air. I'd vote for him!!

I probably would too. I wish I were able to ask Thomas Sowell where we could find such a candidate or who he is voting for.

Nader is probably the only candidate whose positions are even remotely similar to Sowell's positions. What are the odds on Nader's success?

I favor third parties and run-off presidential elections. Without run-off elections, Thomas Sowell, or any third party, has little chance. Imagine if Republican candidate Bush, Democrat candidate Kerry, and third party candidate Sowell were running for president and candidate Sowell was excluded from the debates. American would be denied from hearing one of the most brilliant minds in America debate issues with the leading candidates. To compound the sanctimony the leading candidates tell the citizens that voting for Sowell is a wasted vote.

However, consider the same scenario if no candidate received a majority vote and there were a run-off election between the two candidates receiving the most votes. Thomas Sowell may not be one of those two but under these circumstances, all citizens could have truly voted their conscience without fear of wasting their vote.

24 posted on 03/30/2004 6:40:43 AM PST by MosesKnows
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: MosesKnows
Alan Keyes probably had his best shot back in 2000. He was in most of the debates with Bush and McCain. I voted for Keyes in the MD primary.
26 posted on 03/30/2004 7:04:10 AM PST by 7thson (BT AR - means end of message - no reply necessary or wanted!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: MosesKnows
Umm, last I looked, Nader was a huge proponent of the "living wage" law.
29 posted on 03/30/2004 7:48:25 AM PST by stylin_geek (Koffi: 0, G.W. Bush: (I lost count))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: MosesKnows
Nader is probably the only candidate whose positions are even remotely similar to Sowell's positions. What are the odds on Nader's success?

I had to read these sentences several times to try to grasp the concept of the first one--since Nader is an advocate for cradle to grave socialist nanny government.

As for the second-I hate to sound like the impeached rapist in chief, but it really depends on what the meaning of "success" is.

Nader has been assuring McAuliffe that his presence on the ballot is not going to take votes from democrats...but the fact is that when the slime on Kerry finally oozes through the cracks of the partisan press, democrats of concience - and they all consider themselves people of concience- will not be able to pull the handle (or punch the chad) for Kerry.

After watching the Dick Cavett interview and seeing Kerry's responses to the FBI files proving he was present at a meeting where the assasination of US Senators was discussed, my husband has already stated that he could never vote for Kerry.

Their only alternative will be Nader, which equals success for Bush, but unfortunately, the election of a Republican no longer guarantees the promotion of conservative ideas or policies. It's like process cheese food, you know it's not the real thing, but you swallow it anyway.

30 posted on 03/30/2004 7:51:18 AM PST by Dutchgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson