9/11 Panel's Chiefs Want Rice to Testify Under Oath

The New York Times ^ | 3/30/2004 | PHILIP SHENONand RICHARD W. STEVENSON

[Balata]

Why is it conservatives don't give President Bush and the WH enough credit? After all, they are a smart bunch. I would rather error on the side of giving them credit because they do have access to more info than any of us.

[magua]

because if you see what is happening CONDI RICE IS BEING CRUCIFIED.

[Joy Angela]

Hillary Rodham Clinton is very much
directing the action from behind her Iron Curtain!

Condalezza Rice is but a sacrifice
on Hillary's Presidential Shrine.

[singfreedom]

I agree totally. There is no reason for Condi to testify under oath. The oafs have already outed the fact that they only want her to testify for the purpose of determining "perjury". Just guess who these fools would want to try for perjury?!! If there are, in fact, any Republicans on this commission, which I truly doubt, they have succumbed to the "dumbsense" they always display when confronted by the Democraps. I don't know what it is, but the Republicans try to "play fair" and there is just no way to be "fair", and win, when you're dealing with Clinton Democraps. They have no notion of the concept.

[NYCVirago]

A poll by the Pew Research Center conducted March 22 through Sunday showed Mr. Bush running even with Senator John Kerry of Massachusetts in a head-to-head match-up among registered voters. A poll by Newsweek taken after Mr. Clark's testimony showed that while the president's overall approval rating remained steady at 49 percent, the percentage of voters who said they approved the way he had handled terrorism and domestic security issues had dropped.

Notice how they don't mention the CNN poll which shows Bush at 51%.