Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Fitzcarraldo
No. Unless it was directly beneath it. A 85,000 ton carrier isn't going to be moved by shockwaves from a few miles away if detonated underwater.
79 posted on 03/29/2004 8:20:42 PM PST by xrp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]


To: xrp
I was thinking in terms of the reduced water density due to the vapor generated by the nuclear explosion causing the ship to loose bouyancy for a short period of time.
88 posted on 03/29/2004 8:23:40 PM PST by Fitzcarraldo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]

To: xrp
No. Unless it was directly beneath it. A 85,000 ton carrier isn't going to be moved by shockwaves from a few miles away if detonated underwater.


323 posted on 03/30/2004 7:37:50 AM PST by null and void (Don't stand idly by and watch your country commit Hairy Kerry!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson