Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: xrp
I'm just saying how I would attempt to do it if I were to attempt to do it - which I would not.

Heh! I just realized that might sound kind of funny (stating the obvious). What I mean is that I would not attempt to strike an aircraft carrier in the first place, if I were a terrorist. I would select a vastly softer target.

If I were gonna throw away my life I wouldn't wanna look like a dumbass failure on the way out.. ;^)

114 posted on 03/29/2004 8:31:29 PM PST by AntiGuv (When the countdown hits zero, something's gonna happen..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]


To: AntiGuv
Attacking a soft target, even successfully, -is- a dumbass failure.

I'd have a lot more respect for a guy who went against a hard target, even if he failed. To use the word "terrorist" against someone who went after something like an aircraft carrier really isn't technically accurate. That person has earned the right to be called "enemy combatant". I could at least respect them as a somewhat honorable enemy, though of course still an enemy. The ones who go after civilians have no honor and don't deserve even the dignity of insult.

Qwinn
181 posted on 03/29/2004 9:03:00 PM PST by Qwinn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson