To: HostileTerritory
Hasn't the Mass S.C. already said that a "civil union" wouldn't "cut-it?"
To: Old Professer
Yes, but only within the framework of the current decision and the current consistitution. That's why we're moving to a constitutional amendment. An amendment enacting civil unions would trump the court's decision.
We're going to have same-sex couples marrying for two and a half years before any amendment could come into effect, is the problem.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson