Clarke and the 9-11 Commission (It's over alert)

Newsmax ^ | 3/26/04 | Susan Estrich

[KJacob]

I myself still think Bush will win, but I am a little more worried than I was a week ago.

[areafiftyone]

I am not worried. Monsoor is going to be testifying at the 9/11 commission. THIS AIN'T OVER TILL THE FAT LADY SINGS!

[mewzilla]

Estrich hasn't read Miniter's book, either, apparently. But a lot of other people have. And the info is out there. Unfortunately for the Dems.

[Just mythoughts]

Susan Estrich, the mouth, a servant of the leftist commies is praying aloud.

[Qwinn]

"For God's sake, he's a Republican."

And this is where I stopped reading. This statement is demonstrably false. Yes, Clarke made statements that attempted to mislead listeners into believing it - and that right there discredits him all the more.

The only people who will be snowed by Clarke are those foolish enough to take what he says at face value. IMO, the only people who are that foolish are the ones who were determined to vote against Bush anyway.

Qwinn

[Mr. Bird]

It is just beginning to sink in that there was a man in the White House trying to raise the alarm, and they wouldn't listen; that 9-11 could have been stopped,

Serenity, NOW!

[dirtboy]

Susan Estrich

Crocodile tears from ol' crocodile face.

[mewzilla]

FYI, Susan: I only know of one Dem who's voting Dem this year. Just one. The rest aren't staying home. They're voting Pubbie.

[Sloth]

LOL, Bush will have no problem getting re-elected.

[Snowy]

Monsoor is going to be testifying at the 9/11 commission. THIS AIN'T OVER TILL THE FAT LADY SINGS!

Really? I did not know this. Do you know when?

[WHBates]

Where did you hear Monsoor was testifying. That could be interesting. I wouldn't think that the democrats would let that happen?

[plain talk]

Estrich is lying as usual. Clarke ain't no Republican. He voted for Gore FCOL.

[dirtboy]

I can't believe Condi Rice has time for Sean Hannity and not for the 9-11 Commission.

I see Susan is still on the DNC talking points distribution list. She even tried to disguise it by changing it from "has time for 60 Minutes" to "has time for Sean Hannity" - but she ain't fooling us.

[HarryCaul]

Article is anecdotal evidence, not supported by the polls. It's chicken-littleism.

[anniegetyourgun]

Yep - she's a lib/dem party hack. About as useful as these two:

[Bahbah]

Susan, you complete fool. The man is already a proven liar.

[TexasCajun]

At least you didn't force us to listen to the audio of her!

...like fingernails on a chalkboard.

[OpusatFR]

She's a walking example of the maxim that if you tell a lie long enough, people will believe it. The socialists are masters at revising history.

I also have a maxim: A democrat will always overplay its hand.

[NotQuiteCricket]

What political view point is this author supposed to have - because it is as clear as mud. Looking back on past articles though - I'd guess she is a RAT - in which case she is correct, she does know how it feeeeeeeels to be on the losing side - and it will happen again this year too.