Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: samtheman
Hanoi John French Kerry was perfectly willing and accepting that the communists in Vietnam take over the country ... in fact he argues, here, that he expects the people in the south to welcome it (minus a thousand assasinations or two) and dismissed all the killing by North Vietnamese in Laos. In the 80's he supported despot regimes like Daniel Orgtega and was more than willing for the Soviets to use Nicaragua as a pacific coast base for submarines and the dredging of their port for aircraft carriers just south along the west coast of the United States. He opposed the effort to remove Saddam from Kuwait, even with UN approval and now decries the liberation of Iraq though he previously found it politically desirable to vote for it. This Cavett debate further confirms this man of pure political ambition has no conscience, no soul, no judgment and is an outright clear and present danger to the future of the United States.
56 posted on 03/28/2004 7:52:58 PM PST by Steven W.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]


To: Steven W.
Kerry is satanic, He just acted as if the debate was personal rather than issue oriented. What bs!!
The debate was very substantive. Kerry is total scum.

C-Span is showing this to further advance the "Iraq is Vietnam" line. I really don't like Kerry.
64 posted on 03/28/2004 7:58:04 PM PST by faithincowboys
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

To: Steven W.
Hanoi John French Kerry was perfectly willing and accepting that the communists in Vietnam take over the country ... in fact he argues, here, that he expects the people in the south to welcome it (minus a thousand assasinations or two) and dismissed all the killing by North Vietnamese in Laos. In the 80's he supported despot regimes like Daniel Orgtega and was more than willing for the Soviets to use Nicaragua as a pacific coast base for submarines and the dredging of their port for aircraft carriers just south along the west coast of the United States. He opposed the effort to remove Saddam from Kuwait, even with UN approval and now decries the liberation of Iraq though he previously found it politically desirable to vote for it. This Cavett debate further confirms this man of pure political ambition has no conscience, no soul, no judgment and is an outright clear and present danger to the future of the United States.
Excellent analysis.
67 posted on 03/28/2004 8:02:58 PM PST by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson