Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CyberAnt
Ok, either I missed this program or it wasn't shown here (yet). I tried to find!!!!

So forgive me for not having the feelings I see projected here. Condi is so great, so strong, I can't see how her not appearing in person can do anything but help. It would be an 'in your face'. It would have everyone's attention. After all, Rumsfeld, Powell and Tenet have appeared in person. Condi is as strong as they.

I have spent the last 3 days catching up with the C-Span hearings. I feel we have stated our case well. Condi will, imo, will be the final word. Please educate me to what I'm missing and where I'm wrong.

518 posted on 03/28/2004 11:24:25 PM PST by malia (BUSH/CHENEY '04 NEVER FORGET!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 515 | View Replies ]


To: malia
Condi not testifying under oath or in public is a separation of powers thing.She was appointed by the President,not subject to Congressional confirmation as Cabinet officers are.

The Executive branch is preserving the right of the President to be advised,no holds barred, without Congressional oversight.He does not wish to set a precedent.

The Commission is a child of the Congress,done to satisfy the 911 families and for the dems to take their shots at this administration.The chair and co chair want to take out the partisan bias in the final report.I wish them good luck.
522 posted on 03/29/2004 2:22:52 AM PST by MEG33 (John Kerry's been AWOL for two decades on issues of National Security!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 518 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson