To: Dolphy
Are you serious? Berger, Albright, Clarke and a host of other Democrats vounteered to testify in public to try to force the administration to do so and play defence. That's all the Democrats are screaming about. Now, it's not going to happen Ijaz will tell it all. He was working for the Clinton administration and was the guy who tried to broker the deal between Sudan and Clinton. He knows that Clinton (and Clarke)could have prevented the 9/11 attacks. Clarke was an arrogant fool to think that he could stab the president in the back this way and get away with it.
108 posted on
03/28/2004 3:02:25 PM PST by
Eva
To: Eva
I hate to rain on anybody's parade but Monsourr is as full as a Christmas goose. We have had all sorts of ridiculous inside stories perpetrated by Monsourr. I watch him on Fox all the time and they never pan out. Has anyone on FR ever stopped to consider that the reason we have so much competition in the blame game is that there has been a lot of prevarication(lying)from this side? Do we need Monsourr to trot out some more?
117 posted on
03/28/2004 3:19:53 PM PST by
meenie
To: Eva
So if Clark lied under oath, who else did?
And should they all go to prison?
Yes.
135 posted on
03/28/2004 4:05:40 PM PST by
mabelkitty
(A tuning, a Vote in the topic package to the starting US presidency election fight)
To: Eva
Clarke was an arrogant fool to think that he could stab the president in the back this way and get away with it. There's a school of thought that holds that the playing of Clarke was a checkmate of the highest order.
Let the Rats suck on that for a while.
158 posted on
03/28/2004 5:15:33 PM PST by
txhurl
To: Eva
Are you serious?Yep, I'm serious. That was about the 8th public hearing and I would like to know the process by which they decide who will be heard and where they will be heard. I don't think it's simply whomever volunteers.
181 posted on
03/28/2004 6:20:07 PM PST by
Dolphy
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson