Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Monsoor Ijaz to testify before 9/11 commission
Fox News Channel ^ | 3/28/04 | me

Posted on 03/28/2004 1:36:20 PM PST by alnick

Please forgive the vanity, but I've done a search and cannot find any reference to this.

I saw Monsoor Ijaz on FNC an hour or so ago, and he said that he has been asked to testify before the 9/11 commission. He appeared to be anxious to do so.

If this has been posted elsewhere, I'll ask the mod to take this down.


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 911; 911commission; clarke; ijaz; ijaztestimony; monsoor
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260261-277 next last
To: YoSoy2
It is bipartisan if you believe the libs and dims are the 2 parties.
221 posted on 03/29/2004 6:46:32 AM PST by mathluv (Protect my grandchildren's future. Vote for Bush/Cheney '04.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: alnick
I haven't had time to read entire thread, but what's to keep the lib/dems from demanding that he testify behind closed doors only....while they simultaneously whine about Condi testifying in public?
222 posted on 03/29/2004 6:56:09 AM PST by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salvey
He'd better watch his back, else Arkancide might occur.

He has bigger people gunning for him than two-bit Arkansas wannabe Mafia. The man knows where too many high profile skeletons are buried. The Clinton underworld will have to take their place in a long line which includes Middle East terrorist organizations, Pakistani hit squads, Iranian hit squads, and who knows. Ijaz is probably one of the most wanted (dead, that is) people in the world.

223 posted on 03/29/2004 6:59:29 AM PST by GreyWolf (My $.02)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Dolphy
.

...and now THIS:


'CLINTON, GORE Not Slated to Give 9/11 Testimony Under Oath'

http://www.Freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1107093/posts

.
224 posted on 03/29/2004 7:06:17 AM PST by ALOHA RONNIE (Vet-Battle of IA DRANG-1965 http://www.LZXRAY.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: alnick
Here's a list of Mansoor Ijaz's campaign contributions from 1994-2000.

It appears he hasn't made any doations since.

Very interesting list.

225 posted on 03/29/2004 7:08:10 AM PST by newsmeat.com
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mathluv
when he goes up to testify, the media rats will focus on kobe and scott peterson
226 posted on 03/29/2004 7:14:30 AM PST by petercooper (DemocRATS are socialist scumbags.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 220 | View Replies]

To: anniegetyourgun
I haven't had time to read entire thread, but what's to keep the lib/dems from demanding that he testify behind closed doors only....while they simultaneously whine about Condi testifying in public?


Their respective 'titles' I would think...
227 posted on 03/29/2004 7:18:11 AM PST by lakewriter (For those who fought for it, freedom has a flavor the protected will never know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 222 | View Replies]

To: newsmeat.com
Here's a list of Mansoor Ijaz's campaign contributions from 1994-2000.
It appears he hasn't made any doations since.
Very interesting list.




All made during Clinton era - for whom he worked. He now advises this administration. He strikes me as being more interested in truth - and certainly this donation record will be brought out by one side or the other - whichever needs it most!
The interview I saw on Fox looked as if he were taking the attacks personally. I also believe he was the first one - breaking news on Fox - to reveal that Clinton had three chances for a binLaden hand-over - Ijaz was instrumental in setting this offer(s) up.
228 posted on 03/29/2004 7:28:39 AM PST by lakewriter (For those who fought for it, freedom has a flavor the protected will never know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 225 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
The commission was NEVER intended to be bipartisan in any manner other than WORDS. Think about HOW OFTEN we have heard that Condi Rice SHOULD testify in PUBLIC. Then think how often it was reported that she had TESTIFIED for more than FOUR hours. I never heard it UNTIL she said it on H&C. Then try to find reports that X42 and his suckup will NOT TESTIFY under oath to the commission. You will find MASSIVE discrepencies, as is usually the case in these so called BIPARTISAN hearings.
229 posted on 03/29/2004 7:29:54 AM PST by PISANO (Our troops...... will NOT tire...will NOT falter.....and WILL NOT FAIL!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: alnick
Bump
230 posted on 03/29/2004 7:32:43 AM PST by Darnright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ALOHA RONNIE
'CLINTON, GORE Not Slated to Give 9/11 Testimony Under Oath'

Thanks for the ping. Maybe the commission figured that neither Gore or Clinton hold an oath in much regard;)

231 posted on 03/29/2004 8:41:06 AM PST by Dolphy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 224 | View Replies]

To: Dolphy; Joy Angela; conservogirl; Ragtime Cowgirl; Alamo-Girl; kristinn; Angelwood; miss print; ...
.

No wonder CONDI doesn't want to go before BEN-VENISTE the Leaker on National TV =



'BEN-VENISTE Leaks Excerpt of CONDI's Classified Testimony'

http://www.Newsmax.com/archives/ic/2004/3/29/101656.shtml


All this as MONSOOR IJAZ is a'coming around the corner.

BEN-VENISTE helped Gov. GRAY DAVIS give California its high Energy Prices.

No investigation there is there...
except from Judicial Watch..?


.
232 posted on 03/29/2004 9:05:51 AM PST by ALOHA RONNIE (Vet-Battle of IA DRANG-1965 http://www.LZXRAY.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 231 | View Replies]

To: ALOHA RONNIE
Thanks for the ping!
233 posted on 03/29/2004 9:08:52 AM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 232 | View Replies]

To: ALOHA RONNIE
This push to get Ms. Rice to testify could leak
vital information to America's enemies!

It is also 'the enemies' strategy to degrade
our American Officials and degrade President Bush.

The Enemy *is* Within!

The Enemy *is* Senator Hillary Clinton.

234 posted on 03/29/2004 11:08:10 AM PST by Joy Angela
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 232 | View Replies]

To: newsmeat.com
I don't see anyone listed that he contributed to. I'm assuming that he contributed to democrats because he is (or at least was) a democrat. If his history of contributing cuts off at 2000, maybe he was disgusted with the democrat party after Gore tried to steal the election. Just a guess since I wasn't able to access the list.
235 posted on 03/29/2004 12:20:34 PM PST by alnick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 225 | View Replies]

To: mathluv
I don't know. If I get any further info about the scheduling of Ijaz' testimony, I'll post it.
236 posted on 03/29/2004 12:22:01 PM PST by alnick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 220 | View Replies]

To: alnick
Now now now, we all know that Mansoor Ijaz works for Fox News and therefore has no credibility whatsoever. Its not a reputable source of news such as ABC/Walt Disney Corp., which now employs Mr. Clarke as a news consultant, or Viacom/CBS/Simon & Shuster, which stands to profit from sales of his book. Move along now, nothing to see here!
237 posted on 03/29/2004 12:34:53 PM PST by HenryLeeII ("The war on terror is not a figure of speech, it is an inescapable calling of our generation." -GWB)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: McGruff
BTTT!!!
238 posted on 03/29/2004 12:35:45 PM PST by HenryLeeII ("The war on terror is not a figure of speech, it is an inescapable calling of our generation." -GWB)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Owl_Eagle; 4ConservativeJustices; Ditto; Non-Sequitur; stainlessbanner; Mr. Mojo; sultan88; ...
Block out your schedule for this event - hopefully it will be televised!!!
239 posted on 03/29/2004 12:38:32 PM PST by HenryLeeII ("The war on terror is not a figure of speech, it is an inescapable calling of our generation." -GWB)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Peach
On page 127 of Clarke's new book "Against All Enemies", Clarke notes that it's possible that al Qaida operatives in the Phillipes "taught Terry Nichols how to blow up the Oklahoma Federal Building." Intelligence places Nichols there on the same days as Ramzi Yousef, and "we do know that Nichols's bombs did not work before his Philippines stay and were deadly when he returned."

And there were probably 10,000 other Americans in the Philippines on those same days. Isn't Nichole's wife is a Philippino? Was he just visiting the in-laws? And what about his "bombs" not working before? How many freaking bombs did he build?

I'd like to know where Clarke got this stuff. If he can link OKC to al Quida, he sould do it. But this stuff is sounding like black helocopter filler for a book.

240 posted on 03/29/2004 1:21:15 PM PST by Ditto ( No trees were killed in sending this message, but billions of electrons were inconvenienced.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260261-277 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson